Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
March 2.5-25x52 vs….
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="squeeeeze" data-source="post: 2386018" data-attributes="member: 34065"><p>I have a March 2.5-25x52 D25V52TM with the MTR-3 Reticle. It saved me exactly 10oz. over my previous scope on an otherwise heavy hunting rifle so that was a huge help.</p><p></p><p>The glass is very clear, I have no issues with the eye box (just set it up properly for me), and the parallax adjustment is just different. Much faster and requires a little more precise adjustment, but once set all parallax is out.</p><p></p><p>I agree with the above statement from [USER=120683]@eoperator[/USER] that they should forget the 10X zoom and would be much better served. on paper it sounds amazing! On 2.5x it seems to be a fish eye view and half of the bottom of scope view has the barrel and suppressor in it, not very useable. I don't lose the barrel and suppressor in sight picture until about 5X. On the high end it does get kind of dark at about 22-25X. It would be a much better scope at probably 4-22X. I have used it at around 20-22X and called it good for best clarity and light gathering. I don't have a lot of time behind yet but these were my observations so far.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="squeeeeze, post: 2386018, member: 34065"] I have a March 2.5-25x52 D25V52TM with the MTR-3 Reticle. It saved me exactly 10oz. over my previous scope on an otherwise heavy hunting rifle so that was a huge help. The glass is very clear, I have no issues with the eye box (just set it up properly for me), and the parallax adjustment is just different. Much faster and requires a little more precise adjustment, but once set all parallax is out. I agree with the above statement from [USER=120683]@eoperator[/USER] that they should forget the 10X zoom and would be much better served. on paper it sounds amazing! On 2.5x it seems to be a fish eye view and half of the bottom of scope view has the barrel and suppressor in it, not very useable. I don’t lose the barrel and suppressor in sight picture until about 5X. On the high end it does get kind of dark at about 22-25X. It would be a much better scope at probably 4-22X. I have used it at around 20-22X and called it good for best clarity and light gathering. I don’t have a lot of time behind yet but these were my observations so far. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
March 2.5-25x52 vs….
Top