Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Long Range thick skin bullets
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MontanaRifleman" data-source="post: 862288" data-attributes="member: 11717"><p>However.... in this case the bullet was not a "hunting" bullet although we all know it has a thicker jacket than the hunting bullet, it puts Berger in an awkward position of explaining the terminal ballistics of a non-hunting bullet which they do not recommend for hunting. Not sure how that dialogue would go?</p><p></p><p>My guess is that Berger would suggest to the OP the same thing most of the rest of us have suggested which is to use the 300 gr "hunting" bullet in the 338 LM, although some guys prefer the OTM.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MontanaRifleman, post: 862288, member: 11717"] However.... in this case the bullet was not a "hunting" bullet although we all know it has a thicker jacket than the hunting bullet, it puts Berger in an awkward position of explaining the terminal ballistics of a non-hunting bullet which they do not recommend for hunting. Not sure how that dialogue would go? My guess is that Berger would suggest to the OP the same thing most of the rest of us have suggested which is to use the 300 gr "hunting" bullet in the 338 LM, although some guys prefer the OTM. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Long Range thick skin bullets
Top