Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
"long range" scope challenge. What do you use
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mikecr" data-source="post: 296352" data-attributes="member: 1521"><p>I think it's human nature to defend judgment, even if shoring delusion. We are a stubborn life form.</p><p> </p><p></p><p>I've shot boxes with my Mk4s to the extremes of their adjustments and back. They are in MOA and mine tested perfect. I also looked carefully at reticle alignment. I could really care less about it as I use only crosshairs, but mine tracked plumb with the elevation adjustment plane.</p><p>I actually did this first with 3 NXS scopes. They also did well except one would not return to, and hold zero well. Sent it to NF & they found a lense bedding issue. And luckily for me, One of the NXS in 22x holds zero better than any scope I've used. No matter the gun I set it on, 100yd groups shrink. I have it put aside in the safe as a crucial reloading tool. 'For Load Development Only'. </p><p>Anyway, this led me to testing Mk4s..</p><p>My shooting temps only go from 30 to 100degs.</p><p>I hope my scopes will perform as they have for the rest of my life. That's all I can.</p><p> </p><p></p><p>I don't live anywhere near Hollywood(physically or mentally), so none of this falls within my expectations.</p><p>If I mung up a gun, I'll check it, repair or replace it, before further use.</p><p></p><p>Guess that's me.</p><p> </p><p></p><p>I agree. And I agree about their reticles. I believe NF has the best reticle selections and physical design(etched).</p><p></p><p>I think you'd find carrying a Mk4 a little easier, and doing so for a while would change your perspective on scopes.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mikecr, post: 296352, member: 1521"] I think it's human nature to defend judgment, even if shoring delusion. We are a stubborn life form. I've shot boxes with my Mk4s to the extremes of their adjustments and back. They are in MOA and mine tested perfect. I also looked carefully at reticle alignment. I could really care less about it as I use only crosshairs, but mine tracked plumb with the elevation adjustment plane. I actually did this first with 3 NXS scopes. They also did well except one would not return to, and hold zero well. Sent it to NF & they found a lense bedding issue. And luckily for me, One of the NXS in 22x holds zero better than any scope I've used. No matter the gun I set it on, 100yd groups shrink. I have it put aside in the safe as a crucial reloading tool. 'For Load Development Only'. Anyway, this led me to testing Mk4s.. My shooting temps only go from 30 to 100degs. I hope my scopes will perform as they have for the rest of my life. That's all I can. I don't live anywhere near Hollywood(physically or mentally), so none of this falls within my expectations. If I mung up a gun, I'll check it, repair or replace it, before further use. Guess that's me. I agree. And I agree about their reticles. I believe NF has the best reticle selections and physical design(etched). I think you'd find carrying a Mk4 a little easier, and doing so for a while would change your perspective on scopes. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
"long range" scope challenge. What do you use
Top