Wallie
Well-Known Member
Like everyone else in this thread I'm very happy with my LabRadar, and its accuracy.
If you are positioning the forward facing surface perpendicular to your muzzle (not the end of a suppressor, and not clear back by your action so it's easier to touch the buttons) it will give you good data.
It's also accepted that every barrel will impart a small, unique, and repeatable change in BC to a projectile, by the way the rifling scribe grooves into the jacket bearing surface, and then those rifling cuts effect drag as the spin through atmosphere. This effect was marginal in my past experience, until I started playing with homogeneous alloy lathe turned projectiles, where the same lot gives noticeably different BC values in different barrels.
The tracking of your turrets is as much as +/- 3%, I've ran into that. Even high end ($3k or more) scopes that I have track +/- 1%. Try inputting 1.1 or .99 in your Strelock as your value per click and see if that doesn't make your dope line up. Test your tracking by performing a tall target test at EXACTLY 100 yards (measured from tip of muzzle to surface of target, measured with a tape measure) and I bet you dollars to doughnuts your scope tracing isn't perfect. None of the dozen or so scopes I've tested have been.
The accuracy of your actual target distance is critical, at 800-1000 yards each foot of actual range makes about a third of an inch of vertical, so being off on range by one yard could cause your 60fps correction also.
You can get in the weeds, or you can just accept that there are tolerances in every part of your shooting system, sometimes they stack with each other some times they offset or cancel each other out. It's very possible to figure out what the tolerances are in your system, (I'd start with scope tracking)
OR just let Strelock change that 60fps, make sure that you get the results on target you want, and drive on with life.
I wish you happiness either way you go. I love this hobby and hope you do too.
If you are positioning the forward facing surface perpendicular to your muzzle (not the end of a suppressor, and not clear back by your action so it's easier to touch the buttons) it will give you good data.
Berger also advertises as the lowest manufacture BC value SD, implicitly stating that the BC value is actually an average of possible values, this from a manufacturing perspective.Berger pubishes BC values for their bullets in G7 and G1. It's free information just click on their website. They also publish twist rate information.
It's also accepted that every barrel will impart a small, unique, and repeatable change in BC to a projectile, by the way the rifling scribe grooves into the jacket bearing surface, and then those rifling cuts effect drag as the spin through atmosphere. This effect was marginal in my past experience, until I started playing with homogeneous alloy lathe turned projectiles, where the same lot gives noticeably different BC values in different barrels.
To your point, we don't think YOU are experiencing inaccurate velocity readings with yours. There are many factors that can result in your need to "true" your ballistic problem.Sorry not for sale, it was a birthday present.
No, not solely. I'm using the Labradar for velocity. I used the Berger G7 published BC in the Strelock Pro solver. I shot it at a 1000 yards during different range sessions, to true the velocity, and then confirmed the truing at 800. I had entered all environmental factors in the app. I had to adjust the velocity in the app (trajectory validation) to match the come ups. The app added 60 fps to solve the balistic problem. I didn't adjust the BC since Berger is smarter than I am and I trust their bc is well vetted with that bullet.
Back to point. Have others experienced inaccurate velocity readings with a Labradar?
The tracking of your turrets is as much as +/- 3%, I've ran into that. Even high end ($3k or more) scopes that I have track +/- 1%. Try inputting 1.1 or .99 in your Strelock as your value per click and see if that doesn't make your dope line up. Test your tracking by performing a tall target test at EXACTLY 100 yards (measured from tip of muzzle to surface of target, measured with a tape measure) and I bet you dollars to doughnuts your scope tracing isn't perfect. None of the dozen or so scopes I've tested have been.
The accuracy of your actual target distance is critical, at 800-1000 yards each foot of actual range makes about a third of an inch of vertical, so being off on range by one yard could cause your 60fps correction also.
You can get in the weeds, or you can just accept that there are tolerances in every part of your shooting system, sometimes they stack with each other some times they offset or cancel each other out. It's very possible to figure out what the tolerances are in your system, (I'd start with scope tracking)
OR just let Strelock change that 60fps, make sure that you get the results on target you want, and drive on with life.
I wish you happiness either way you go. I love this hobby and hope you do too.