- Joined
- May 2, 2001
- Messages
- 7,521
The illumination technology today is much better than the first time, 14 years ago, that I tried illumination and felt it did not aid me in my shooting.
What say you?
What say you?
I guess if someone drags me out an hour before sunrise to shoot as early as optically possible at distance...
Ha!If I were you I would learn to stand up on your own two legs and just say "NO!" using your big boy voice.
The illumination technology today is much better than the first time, 14 years ago, that I tried illumination and felt it did not aid me in my shooting.
What say you?
The illumination in my Sightron actually helps quite a bit and does not distract from the target image. If the reticle were thicker it wouldn't need illumination but it helps a lot on shots against dark backgrounds or as light begins to fade. It is my only experience with a "nice" illuminated reticle so I don't know how it compares to everything else.If it's too dark to see the reticle superimposed on the the target, illuminating the reticle will only make the target more difficult to see. Realize that the resolution of the human eye is only about 1/10 as good when dark adapted as when using the color sensitive cones in the eye's fovea.
Three solutions are:
1. Use a spotlight to illuminate the target (where and when legal)
2. Use an image intensifier (where and when legal)
3. Don't hunt when there's not enough light for your naked eye color vision to be active. No non-electronic scope allows color vision in lower illumination.
Illuminated reticles seem like a good idea until you try to use them. I consider them useless.