Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
I want a legit argument against an old trusted cartridge
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jammer65" data-source="post: 1724861" data-attributes="member: 49757"><p>Absolutely nothing wrong with a 7 mag. If you do decide to step up to a heavier round, I would personally go with the 300PRC over the 300 WM. The WM has a very short neck and seating bullets to fit into a magazine consumes a lot of powder capacity. The PRC is designed to seat the bullets further out and still achieve magazine limited lengths. I own and shoot a 300WM, but when it is ready for another barrel, it is going to be be converted to the PRC.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jammer65, post: 1724861, member: 49757"] Absolutely nothing wrong with a 7 mag. If you do decide to step up to a heavier round, I would personally go with the 300PRC over the 300 WM. The WM has a very short neck and seating bullets to fit into a magazine consumes a lot of powder capacity. The PRC is designed to seat the bullets further out and still achieve magazine limited lengths. I own and shoot a 300WM, but when it is ready for another barrel, it is going to be be converted to the PRC. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
I want a legit argument against an old trusted cartridge
Top