I anyone truing up case heads?

tlk

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2008
Messages
238
I noticed that when I am trying to use my honady comparator on some brands of brass I am geting over .001 of variance when I spin the cases in the calipers and the comparator, and all of the chatter is coming from the case head on the caliper jaws.

Did some looking into this and found that the deep stamping on the case head by some mfrs is causing peaks and valleys, and in one case I found the entire head was coned slightly, I suppose becuase the stamping was covering the case head. When I took a couple of the cases that had this issue and ran them across a FINE whetsone (head flat against the stone), this variation went away and was able to get consistent readings. Not a lot of removal - just enough to get rid of the high areas and produce a flat surface to measure off of. Seems to work well, though not techinically "trued".

The reason this is important to me is that if I am using a comparator to set my bullet jump or a slight crush fit/touch to within .001, the friggin' case head may cause me to be off, which throws off the data that I think I am using.

So, is anyone truing up case heads? If so, how are you doing it?

Oh, and, once again, Lapua doesn't seem to suffer from this issue as much as others, and I noticed that their headstamps are much shallower than the rest.
 
Last edited:
Just one more problem from mass productionof components. You'r doing the same thing i do on most brass.
 
Wilson trimmer system. Turn the case holder around, with the case inserted and go to cranking. Caution: hold the case holder firmly to prevent chatter.

Or, Soup that sucker up and "fire form the head". Repeat the process and the head stamp all but disappears. But not before the case has been rendered useless.:rolleyes::rolleyes:
 
Wilson trimmer system. Turn the case holder around, with the case inserted and go to cranking. Caution: hold the case holder firmly to prevent chatter.


This is an idea alright ....although I shoot lapua brass in 6.5x55 I have not been to technical on the case head truing. I shoot a sporting rifle so I wont figet to much with this as my bullets dont sit so close to the lands anyhow.
 
I drag them across a sheet of extra fine emery paper. It does the same thing you described in your post. It knocks the headstamp burrs down and makes them easier to read too.
 
I noticed that when I am trying to use my honady comparator on some brands of brass I am geting over .001 of variance when I spin the cases in the calipers and the comparator, and all of the chatter is coming from the case head on the caliper jaws.

How much variation? How are you measuring variation? Over 0.001" isn't particularely specific. If you measure one case over and over spinning it around writing down every measurement how much variation do you see? Of the measurements taken that show variation which one do you think is the most correct of the set?

The reason I ask is that I'm not convinced that 0.001 or even slightly over 0.001" like 0.002" crush variation matters at all for accuracy. Trying for 0.001" extreme spread repeatability on something as flexable and springy as cartridge brass using a gross measurement tool like a digital caliper is like trying to slice cheese with optical precision for a couple of reasons.

Digital calipers aren't good for 0.001" extreme spread in any absolute statistical sense from day to day. Micrometers are but not digital calipers.

The brass can't be counted on to repeat within .001" extreme spread from case to case.

The reason neck sizing can work at all is because the brass has spring back from even as precise a process as the fireforming that happens in a chamber when the round is fired which is the most repeatable thing one ever does with brass. The good news is that springback makes brass usable because with out it extraction of fired cases would be quite difficult. The bad news is that springback makes rifles cases poor candidates for extreme precision when it comes to shoulder set back.

This is further complicated by the fact that nearly all bolt actions (except maybe Savages with their floating bolt head) have 0.001" or more of change in the plane of the bolt face itself between the time the firing pin hits the primer and the bullet leaves the brass because the bolt flops up and down in the rear (which is why bolts are sleeved on some benchrest rifles and some long range rifles).

I could see gently dragging the base across some 800 grit emery to get rid of a burr on some cases just to make measurement easier though I've never done that. Machining the base in a Wilson trimmer might make one feel better but unless it's done very carefully it could result in thinning the rim and increasing the probability of extraction problems.

If it contributes to the fun of reloading and shooting, or eliminates some frustration, with the measurement process, go for it, but I seriously doubt there is any significant difference between brass that's had either process applied and brass not subjected to either process on either the target or game.

Fitch
 
Fitch,

Spot on! Great post.

I don't even mess with it.

Goodgrouper is one that goes ape anal over truing case heads but I never learned how it does it.

The wilson idea I presented was what it was. An idea. Never tried it.:rolleyes:
 
I started using my drag-it-across-emery-paper technique because I like to chuck the brass up in a Lee 3-Jaw chuck or the Lee Lock Stud when trimming using the Lee Cutter. The Lee tools press the base of the brass against an anvil. If the brass has burrs on the bottom it won't sit flush to the anvil and wobbles in the drill press. A simple drag across the paper fixes that problem.
 
Wilson trimmer system. Turn the case holder around, with the case inserted and go to cranking. Caution: hold the case holder firmly to prevent chatter.

I use the Wilson case trimmer with the Sinclair International carbide cutter made for the Wilson unit. With the magnum class of cases, 300WM, 7mm RM, 300 RUM, etc, the cutter diameter doesn't quite cut to the full outer diameter of the case heads. I drag these case heads over a 8" long sharpening stone to remove the little lip left by the carbide cutter.

Does it improve my groups? Got no idea... It does improve the case head to bolt face alignment.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 15 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.
Top