Huskemaw scope

[lancetkenyon]

I have shot a few of them. Not a lot, but enough to be able to critique them.

Glass is average. Nothing great, nothing terrible. About like a mid-tier Vortex.

I do not like the .333MOA click value. Make it a 1/4MOA (.261") or .1MIL (.36") @ 100 yds. If you are used to a normal MOA scope and just count clicks, you could really screw yourself.

 

[Mt.Vernon]

Get the nightforce and be done with it.

 

[cbat]

What did you think of the Huskemaw? Does it compare to any lower tier optic?

It was ok. I probably won't buy another one.

 

[Laelkhunter]

Dmagna,

On my first hunt with my new March the illumination knob disappeared. First hunt. I called March.

The lady was going to charge me about $180 for a new one. When I whined about it being the first hunt she gave me 10% off. Big deal. The money transfer cost another $45, so it still cost $205 on top of $2,550 for the cost of the scope.

That's horrible. That's like having a wheel fall off of your brand new car, and they want to charge you for another tire to put back on it.

 

[xsn10s]

I'd still rather have a March than that other scope lol.

 

[Rich Coyle]

I too would. It has slightly better glass for low light than Leupold VX6 4-24X52 and Swarovski z5 5-25X52. The day light on the optics chart they are about the same.