MontanaRifleman
Well-Known Member
When I typed "antis", I meant LRH antis, not tree hugging antis.
To play devils advocate, just because I don't publicize everything I do doesn't mean that I am ashamed, hiding or lying. Sometimes I pass to avoid unproductive confrontation although as many of you know I can be outspoken about some things.
So far most of the posts reflect my onion on the subject of LRH... BUT... as I said before, we are seeing this through our own eyes and preaching to the choir.
Is discretion sometimes a wiser choice?
Do the befits of being completely open out weigh the possible negative impact?
Let's take Facebook for instance. I am on FB and I have no problem posting hunting pics of dead animals... however, I would not post autopsy and bloody pics because I know it would offend some of my friends. A very few of my friends are anti-hunting and some others are indifferent. Any hunting pics would be offensive to the ones who are anti, but I draw the line at posting the "cleaner" pics. Posting the gorier pics might offend the more neutral friends and I choose not to do that although the reality is that hunting is a bloody sport.
Some folks need some time to adjust and come around and force feeding can be counter productive.
On the other site I was talking about, I have chosen to be selective about what I post but I do occasionally push the limit a little without stirring the pot too much. The general trend is that many of the members of that site are coming around slowly to the acceptable idea of long range hunting... but not all.
Now this site is in fact dedicated to LRH, so I would be much more free in what I post here... but are there ANY "wise" boundaries?
I have no problem with the video. The question is does it do more harm than good? Will it alienate those who are less knowledgeable and experienced and haven't really made a decision?
To play devils advocate, just because I don't publicize everything I do doesn't mean that I am ashamed, hiding or lying. Sometimes I pass to avoid unproductive confrontation although as many of you know I can be outspoken about some things.
So far most of the posts reflect my onion on the subject of LRH... BUT... as I said before, we are seeing this through our own eyes and preaching to the choir.
Is discretion sometimes a wiser choice?
Do the befits of being completely open out weigh the possible negative impact?
Let's take Facebook for instance. I am on FB and I have no problem posting hunting pics of dead animals... however, I would not post autopsy and bloody pics because I know it would offend some of my friends. A very few of my friends are anti-hunting and some others are indifferent. Any hunting pics would be offensive to the ones who are anti, but I draw the line at posting the "cleaner" pics. Posting the gorier pics might offend the more neutral friends and I choose not to do that although the reality is that hunting is a bloody sport.
Some folks need some time to adjust and come around and force feeding can be counter productive.
On the other site I was talking about, I have chosen to be selective about what I post but I do occasionally push the limit a little without stirring the pot too much. The general trend is that many of the members of that site are coming around slowly to the acceptable idea of long range hunting... but not all.
Now this site is in fact dedicated to LRH, so I would be much more free in what I post here... but are there ANY "wise" boundaries?
I have no problem with the video. The question is does it do more harm than good? Will it alienate those who are less knowledgeable and experienced and haven't really made a decision?