There is no danger going either way, the burn is the same with either powder. I know 'cause I worked for ADI testing military ammo.
Cheers.
gun)
Thank you for that. Yes it has been clear for years that the data is interchangeable. I never said anything about dangers, I said case capacity issues.
PLEASE READ: What I said was
case capacity issues. Nothing was said about danger.
Example:
My load of H4381 SC is 100% case capacity for my 300 WSM with a 208 A-Max. Load is below book max.
That same load by weight of H4381 is 105% case capacity. Book max is a compressed load so there may not be an pressure problem with that. I don't have a "Pressure Trace II" sensor on that rifle.
I'm just a stupid software engineer and it could all be down to different lots of powder.
I did make my living for decades being very detail oriented. I could have missed something.
That said, I have found in the real world that there is a difference. Loads don't "work" just substituting SC or SSC for "regular". My SC load works, with "regular" it doesn't. Reverse it for I7828 in a 270 Wby. Regular "works" SSC does not.
Yes, according to the manuals, there is no danger. That is not the issue. The case capacity issue is that groups/accuracy and velocity change, necessitating reworking the load.