Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
H4350 vs RL22
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Westfork" data-source="post: 1779332" data-attributes="member: 109839"><p>I haven'ttried RL22 in 6.5 CM but I have used it in 6.5x55 using 140 grain Nosler Partitions and Sierra GameKings. </p><p></p><p>In my limited testing, it produced adequate hunting accuracy without any sign of high pressure of any kind (in my rifle), even exceeding book maximum by a few grains. </p><p></p><p>But, H4350 had better group size.</p><p></p><p>In 6.5 CM I worked up loads using H4350 and W760, of the two, the H4350 loads were much more accurate than the W760 loads.</p><p></p><p>Rifles for both are Ruger M77 Hawkeye.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Westfork, post: 1779332, member: 109839"] I haven'ttried RL22 in 6.5 CM but I have used it in 6.5x55 using 140 grain Nosler Partitions and Sierra GameKings. In my limited testing, it produced adequate hunting accuracy without any sign of high pressure of any kind (in my rifle), even exceeding book maximum by a few grains. But, H4350 had better group size. In 6.5 CM I worked up loads using H4350 and W760, of the two, the H4350 loads were much more accurate than the W760 loads. Rifles for both are Ruger M77 Hawkeye. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
H4350 vs RL22
Top