• If you are being asked to change your password, and unsure how to do it, follow these instructions. Click here

h-380

I beleive the powder's "dirtyness" has to do with how efficient it is in a particular case. I keep a little on hand and have used it in a 30-06 300wsm and 22-250. I had the best results in the 22-250 but it isn't my favorite powder in my rifles. Some people have excellent luck with it. It was primarily used in the 22-250 and was vary popular.
 
I have literally burned pounds of H-380. In certain applications it is my go to powder. I have a 220 swift that thrives on it. I also have a 25-06 that begs to be fed a steady diet. I probably have ten pounds in storage now if I looked. The previous post was spot on in that if the charge isn't fully burnt it will appear dirty. In my loads other than the distinct smell of H-380 in the air, it is totally consumed before it hits the end of the barrel.

WS
 
bull,
I have read that it was developed by Bruce Hodgdon for the .22-250Rem. He used 38.0 (380) gns behind, either a 50 or 55 gn bullet. Not sure of the bullet weight, but that was the powder charge.
I tried it in the couple of .22-250's that I have owned and it never outperformed IMR and H4895. I also tried it in a friends .300WSM (Nosler) in an attempt to find the best grouping load. I have some on hand but don't reach for it very often. JohnnyK.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 16 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.
Top