After having responded to a scope question and reflecting on another day spent fixing more problems with the nesika action I spent way too much for, I thought back to the number of times on this forum I have heard someone claim that price was a leading issue in the decision on purchasing a scope. Think about this for a while....
We can buy a Rem 700 adl syn new for $400, then steal the action to build a gun.
A nesika action like mine is $1485 and then another $2000 have it trued and to fix all the problems with it and you have an action.
Scope for the gun will cost $400-1500, depending on what you buy.
Trigger, $80-220.
Scope rings and bases, $40-200.
Stock, 80-500.
Barrel $200-500
And so on and so forth. Many of the hand tools we buy for mundane things like neck turning or primer pocket uniforming or measuring powder, are SO varied in price and quality.
But....
From a manufacturing standpoint, those out there who do any machining will appreciate what I am about to point out...
What part of a gun should cost the most. A barrel is just a hunk of steel with a hole drilled in it, then some grooves smashed in. An action is just a hunk of steel with a hole drilled in it and some grooves smashed in. A trigger is made up of parts out of a punch press. Polished, yea. A stock is a hunk of wood or some crap glue squirted in a mold for 400 bucks. Scope mounts are knocked out like **** through a goose.
A scope is a perversly precise instrument that is made to withstand a lifetime of sheer abuse, have beautifully crafted glass, waterproof, shockproof, repeatable to gazillionths of an inch and costs about the same as any other part of the gun. We pay $400 for a barrel and then have some guy drill a hole in with tolerances of about 1 mile and end up with the same money as we pay for the scope that we complain about being "inaccurate". How about the star shaped chamber job, that's ok?? How about the action that's not hard, lugs gall, extractor doesn't work, threads are .008 out of concentricity to the bolt bore, face is .003 out of square, firing pin bore is too small, firing pin sear is the wrong one for the action, recoil lug is a $50 option, and to top it off, screws are not included. All for the bargain deal of $1485. (that's a nesika action folks...)
Now, I don't care if you're a nightforce guy, or leupold, or nikon, burris, tasco, zeiss, whatever. Even the worst scope is made to tolerances so much greater than all the other parts, most people can't truely immagine it. While looking through my black diamond yesterday, with the gun stuffed in a vise in the milling machine (to set it up) I was playing around with the power ring to see if the point of impact would change if I moved it around. Well, my crosshairs were on a building 100yds away, (for what it's worth, it's truely 1 0 0 yards from the table) and the crosshairs didn't even move when I yanked sideways and up/dn on the eyepiece. Amazing. I was thinking about the manufacturing tolerance that had to be held to alow me to spin the parallax ring, spin the power ring, and have everything point to the same spot. I positively cannot make something to those tolerances and neither can 99% of the people here. Perhaps 100%. Yet, we will all complain about the cost of a scope. In truth, at any price, it's the best VALUE we get in gun related parts. Try having your gunsmith make a better one for you. At any price. Or even improve an existing one. Even a El-Cheapo scope.
I liken it to the person who complains about the price of a gallon of gas at $1.60 while sitting drinking water, barley, hops, and malt for $2.50/12oz. $1.60/gal for something we can't possibly make at home is too much, yet, $26.50/gal for something we can get mostly for free from our faucet is A-ok.
This is one business where I would say that price and quality do not, necessarily go hand in hand. I'm not even sure what the prices of items are based upon...
We can buy a Rem 700 adl syn new for $400, then steal the action to build a gun.
A nesika action like mine is $1485 and then another $2000 have it trued and to fix all the problems with it and you have an action.
Scope for the gun will cost $400-1500, depending on what you buy.
Trigger, $80-220.
Scope rings and bases, $40-200.
Stock, 80-500.
Barrel $200-500
And so on and so forth. Many of the hand tools we buy for mundane things like neck turning or primer pocket uniforming or measuring powder, are SO varied in price and quality.
But....
From a manufacturing standpoint, those out there who do any machining will appreciate what I am about to point out...
What part of a gun should cost the most. A barrel is just a hunk of steel with a hole drilled in it, then some grooves smashed in. An action is just a hunk of steel with a hole drilled in it and some grooves smashed in. A trigger is made up of parts out of a punch press. Polished, yea. A stock is a hunk of wood or some crap glue squirted in a mold for 400 bucks. Scope mounts are knocked out like **** through a goose.
A scope is a perversly precise instrument that is made to withstand a lifetime of sheer abuse, have beautifully crafted glass, waterproof, shockproof, repeatable to gazillionths of an inch and costs about the same as any other part of the gun. We pay $400 for a barrel and then have some guy drill a hole in with tolerances of about 1 mile and end up with the same money as we pay for the scope that we complain about being "inaccurate". How about the star shaped chamber job, that's ok?? How about the action that's not hard, lugs gall, extractor doesn't work, threads are .008 out of concentricity to the bolt bore, face is .003 out of square, firing pin bore is too small, firing pin sear is the wrong one for the action, recoil lug is a $50 option, and to top it off, screws are not included. All for the bargain deal of $1485. (that's a nesika action folks...)
Now, I don't care if you're a nightforce guy, or leupold, or nikon, burris, tasco, zeiss, whatever. Even the worst scope is made to tolerances so much greater than all the other parts, most people can't truely immagine it. While looking through my black diamond yesterday, with the gun stuffed in a vise in the milling machine (to set it up) I was playing around with the power ring to see if the point of impact would change if I moved it around. Well, my crosshairs were on a building 100yds away, (for what it's worth, it's truely 1 0 0 yards from the table) and the crosshairs didn't even move when I yanked sideways and up/dn on the eyepiece. Amazing. I was thinking about the manufacturing tolerance that had to be held to alow me to spin the parallax ring, spin the power ring, and have everything point to the same spot. I positively cannot make something to those tolerances and neither can 99% of the people here. Perhaps 100%. Yet, we will all complain about the cost of a scope. In truth, at any price, it's the best VALUE we get in gun related parts. Try having your gunsmith make a better one for you. At any price. Or even improve an existing one. Even a El-Cheapo scope.
I liken it to the person who complains about the price of a gallon of gas at $1.60 while sitting drinking water, barley, hops, and malt for $2.50/12oz. $1.60/gal for something we can't possibly make at home is too much, yet, $26.50/gal for something we can get mostly for free from our faucet is A-ok.
This is one business where I would say that price and quality do not, necessarily go hand in hand. I'm not even sure what the prices of items are based upon...