In discussing the possibility of a ban on ARs, I've been surprised at the number of gun owners who support such a ban.
None of those that do, of course, actually own an AR and they take a "Go ahead and ban them, won't affect me in the least" attitude. Has anyone else encountered such selfish bs?
I don't own one, either, but it seems to me that the AR should be more protected by the Second Amendment than our elk rifles.
We all know that those who want to take away our gun rights won't stop at the AR and it appalls me to find support for such a ban among us.
As far as I'm concerned, supporting a ban on ARs because you don't own one is like supporting a limit on free speech because you don't run a newspaper.
None of those that do, of course, actually own an AR and they take a "Go ahead and ban them, won't affect me in the least" attitude. Has anyone else encountered such selfish bs?
I don't own one, either, but it seems to me that the AR should be more protected by the Second Amendment than our elk rifles.
We all know that those who want to take away our gun rights won't stop at the AR and it appalls me to find support for such a ban among us.
As far as I'm concerned, supporting a ban on ARs because you don't own one is like supporting a limit on free speech because you don't run a newspaper.