Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
G7 BR2500 VS SIG KILO2400ABS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Greyfox" data-source="post: 1490711" data-attributes="member: 10291"><p>I have used the G7 in both the original and and second generation versions since there introduction about 7 years ago. I have also owned and used the Sig 2400 for 2 years, a couple of Leica's, and the original Terrapin(with a Kestral for ELR)for 5 years. All have been used for hunting, targets, and competition with hundreds of ranging/dope determinations. They are all capable of getting the job done in varying degrees. For my LR hunting(longest game shot 1188 yards), I prefer either version of the G7. IMO, it's immediately evident in the field that the feature set of the G7 was designed by LR hunters. The fingertip controls for filtering obstacles, and wind calculation, and most importantly, the reliable environmental sensors/ballistic outputs across a wide range of conditions delivers fast results with very high confidence. Battery life is 2-3x greater then the Sig 2400, and both G7's I have owned have proven to be 100% reliable with rough usage over extended periods of time, a claim that I can't make for all my RF's. </p><p></p><p>Just a few days ago in the foothills of the Bighorns. I had about 20 seconds to take a clean shot. Interfering sage, 4 other goats, 15-20 MPH wind, changing positions at 600 yards. Shoulder shot, DRT. G7 did its job well.....again. </p><p>[ATTACH]107159[/ATTACH]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Greyfox, post: 1490711, member: 10291"] I have used the G7 in both the original and and second generation versions since there introduction about 7 years ago. I have also owned and used the Sig 2400 for 2 years, a couple of Leica’s, and the original Terrapin(with a Kestral for ELR)for 5 years. All have been used for hunting, targets, and competition with hundreds of ranging/dope determinations. They are all capable of getting the job done in varying degrees. For my LR hunting(longest game shot 1188 yards), I prefer either version of the G7. IMO, it’s immediately evident in the field that the feature set of the G7 was designed by LR hunters. The fingertip controls for filtering obstacles, and wind calculation, and most importantly, the reliable environmental sensors/ballistic outputs across a wide range of conditions delivers fast results with very high confidence. Battery life is 2-3x greater then the Sig 2400, and both G7’s I have owned have proven to be 100% reliable with rough usage over extended periods of time, a claim that I can’t make for all my RF’s. Just a few days ago in the foothills of the Bighorns. I had about 20 seconds to take a clean shot. Interfering sage, 4 other goats, 15-20 MPH wind, changing positions at 600 yards. Shoulder shot, DRT. G7 did its job well.....again. [ATTACH]107159[/ATTACH] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
G7 BR2500 VS SIG KILO2400ABS
Top