First Savage - Model 11 VT

  • Thread starter Deleted member 46119
  • Start date
D

Deleted member 46119

Guest
Since I have resolved that my Wby VG will become a 22-250 when opportunity knocked with a Savage in 223, I answered.

Model 11 VT 223. 24"

As I understand it a "Dick's Sporting Goods" special.

The one question I don't really understand. What is the difference in Savage "models". Except for the target action, they all seem the same.

I plan on doing small caliber "switch barrel" stuff with it.
 
They are all the same. Differences are color, stocks.
Lots of chrome, I means options, options....

Was thinking of the old saying if it won't go, chrome it:)
 
What about:
Long action vs Short action?
Small shank vs large shank?
 
What about:
Long action vs Short action?
Small shank vs large shank?

a Savage short action is a little bit longer than a Remington, so it should be just fine for any bullet length and yet keeping the bullet in the neck instead of the shoulder area. With a .378" case diameter, a small shank is all that's needed. The 24" barrel is actually on the long side for the case size. A 22" barrel is about right. I've had them all from 15" to 26", and this round really likes a short stiff barrel. (same with a .222 I might add)
gary
 
Single digits are small action: 10,11,12, etc
Triple are long action: 110,111,112,etc

Unless it's a WSM which I don't think are in production anymore, only the target action is a large shank. But they are the Dane footprint anywho. The single shots have a third screw in the center where the magazine would be
 
So to regurgitate to see if I get it.

Model 11 = small action, small shank.

24" vs 22", well I've all ways preferred longer over shorter.
 
shooting 55 grain bullets in a 26" barrel at near max loads, verses the same bullet in a 20" barrel was a whopping 74 fps. With a powder burn rate adjustment, the difference is slightly under 50 fps. The same loading in a 22" barrel (different rifle) was almost identical to the 26" barrel.
gary
 
Warning! This thread is more than 10 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Recent Posts

Top