Elementary ballistics question from a dummy.

sportmuaythai

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 18, 2009
Messages
122
Energy table for rifle cartridges are simply shown as foot pounds. I was told that it is foot pound per square inch. So what is the real answer, simply foot pound, or foot pound per square inch?
 
This is a good question. Foot-pounds is generally a measure of rotational torque - so could we say the bullet has so much rotational torque?

For a known bullet in flight, we have velocity, mass, frontal area, angle of frontal area - we should be able to calculate impact pressure in psi, and momentum. I think with all of this we should be able to calculate total kinetic energy.

The trick is to take these values and translate them into lethality - many folks have tried it over the years - but each formula is imperfect. Over time I've fallen into using the Optimum Game Weight-Big Game method solely because it was easy to use and seemed reasonable - but again I use it only as a rough approximation.

Jay
 
Thanks Jay. I take the figures as rough indicator of how powerful they are compared to other bullets of same type, but in different weight and at various ranges. Mean while, I await others to chime in.
 
Foot-pounds and pound-feet—what's the difference? | Mac's Motor City Garage

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pound-foot_(torque)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foot-pound_(energy)

pound- feet is torque... angular momentum or a vector

ie you are pulling with 100# of force on a 1 foot wrench handle

foot- pound is a simple unit of work... ie. the force it took to lift one # one foot.

so your 243 has as much muzzle energy as a Volkswagen lifted one foot over said target. The only difference is the footprint the force is exerted on.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 11 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Recent Posts

Top