i haven't ever played with COAL until i started using berger VLD's. up until now if the loading manual stated a 3.290 coal for a 7RM i would seat to 3.290 and work my load until i got it under 1 inch at 100 yards.
i am looking to extend my range, so i picked up a new rifle, sendero in 7rm, and the previous owner did use bergers and found the optimal length of 3.475 worked in this rifle. i did some measuring, and testing, and 3.475 did indeed end up being .080 off the lands. worked up a load, and got a pretty impressive *to me* group sitting at .53 inch at 100 yards.
i was shooting the breeze with another shooter who happened to mention that when he started using bergers in his 300 win mag, he got great consistancy, but was lacking in velocity once he seated teh bullets far out. he supposed it was due to the added head space in the case leading to lower pressures. now, he has the benefit of having a chrony to verify his findings, and adjusted his load to match normal velocities and noticed no signs of over pressure.
so if his semi scientific tests are accurate... could this be the case? i haven't ever read anything about it online, nor in any of the loading manuals i have kicking around *lee , berger, nosler, all latest prints* or is it a case of me over thinking it, and should just get a chrony and answer my own questions...
i am looking to extend my range, so i picked up a new rifle, sendero in 7rm, and the previous owner did use bergers and found the optimal length of 3.475 worked in this rifle. i did some measuring, and testing, and 3.475 did indeed end up being .080 off the lands. worked up a load, and got a pretty impressive *to me* group sitting at .53 inch at 100 yards.
i was shooting the breeze with another shooter who happened to mention that when he started using bergers in his 300 win mag, he got great consistancy, but was lacking in velocity once he seated teh bullets far out. he supposed it was due to the added head space in the case leading to lower pressures. now, he has the benefit of having a chrony to verify his findings, and adjusted his load to match normal velocities and noticed no signs of over pressure.
so if his semi scientific tests are accurate... could this be the case? i haven't ever read anything about it online, nor in any of the loading manuals i have kicking around *lee , berger, nosler, all latest prints* or is it a case of me over thinking it, and should just get a chrony and answer my own questions...