Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Did 6.5 PRC obsolete the 6.5 CM only to be made obsolete?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mark1Mod0Squid" data-source="post: 1955643" data-attributes="member: 104413"><p>Wasn't part of the original appeal of the 6.5 cartridges (.260rem, 6.5x47, 6.5cm) that they bridged a gap between 308 and 300wm and had an extended barrel life compared to other options with similar ballistics? If so, where does the 6.5prc fall in the "barrel life+what can't other cartridges do" metric? Does this even apply to the original question?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mark1Mod0Squid, post: 1955643, member: 104413"] Wasn't part of the original appeal of the 6.5 cartridges (.260rem, 6.5x47, 6.5cm) that they bridged a gap between 308 and 300wm and had an extended barrel life compared to other options with similar ballistics? If so, where does the 6.5prc fall in the "barrel life+what can't other cartridges do" metric? Does this even apply to the original question? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Did 6.5 PRC obsolete the 6.5 CM only to be made obsolete?
Top