Choosing a scope for an ultralight LR rig.

Tikkamike

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2009
Messages
5,503
Location
Big Horn Basin, Wyoming
I'm building an ultralight 338 rum. Titanium action, proof barrel, carbon fiber McMillan stock etc.. I'm calling it my "no expense sparred build" I want this to be the absolute best possible rifle I can make it. I'm stuck at the scope. I'm very happy with NF NXS 3.5-15x50mm I really like that power range and everything the NF has to offer... Other than the weight. I have been told by a couple buddies that the mk4 is a solid choice. I am curious about the razor HD LH but a little concerned that it's SO light and SO inexpensive. Anyone have any experience with those? I'm looking for suggestions. I want an MOA reticle and a turret with positive clicks.
 
If I had that setup, I would be seriously looking at the offerings from March. Lightweight, excellent glass, positive clicks and repeatable tracking. Ever since I got to try one for about 10 sessions, been saving to put one on my STW. Just a suggestion. The Vx-6 in a 3-18 is working well for me, but it doesn't have the WOW factor of the March.
 
.......The Vx-6 in a 3-18 is working well for me, but it doesn't have the WOW factor of the March.

I keep looking for the same thing, and end up back at the Vx 6 3-18. I was happy with my 2-12 until the 3-18 was available. The 4-24x is just a little heavier.
 
While there are lots of different scopes in the safe there is an easy to understand theme.

Pure bench, Weaver
Long Range F-/Tactical Sightron
Harsh recoil, Leupold or Nightforce

Hunting, Leupold, Leupold, Leupold.
 
........I have been told by a couple buddies that the mk4 is a solid choice.........

I missed that first time through, but I've had good luck with the Mark 4's
 
I'd be looking at a 3.5-18 Z5 Swarovski. They're pretty light weight but impeccable optics.

I've have a range of Leupolds and Nightforces including an ATACR but the Z5 on my 280 Ackley is a favourite.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 9 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.
Top