Just thinking out loud here. I dont hear much in the way of bullet talk.
Concave VS convex bullet ogive
Rings around bullet wether recessed or raised
I may have to pattent this next one, golf ball dimples on bullets bearing surface. Possibly even entire bullet.
I think it would be interesting to hear of different designed bullet being test, which Im sure they have been.
Also tungsten core bullets?
Lastly I would think by now all bullets would be cad designed for the highest BC possible per weight. It seem weird that alot of the more main stream weights seem to be better designed(ie higher BC) than others.
Examples:
Sierra MK 175 BC .505 and the sierra 180 is .475, why bother? I can ony think that some are hanging on shorter ogives for length purposses.
Concave VS convex bullet ogive
Rings around bullet wether recessed or raised
I may have to pattent this next one, golf ball dimples on bullets bearing surface. Possibly even entire bullet.
I think it would be interesting to hear of different designed bullet being test, which Im sure they have been.
Also tungsten core bullets?
Lastly I would think by now all bullets would be cad designed for the highest BC possible per weight. It seem weird that alot of the more main stream weights seem to be better designed(ie higher BC) than others.
Examples:
Sierra MK 175 BC .505 and the sierra 180 is .475, why bother? I can ony think that some are hanging on shorter ogives for length purposses.