Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Bullet stability
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Zen Archery" data-source="post: 2825778" data-attributes="member: 60545"><p>Correct me if I'm wrong but aren't TR based off minimal TR or faster? Your 1/2 TR should be well within stabilization range. As for faster velocity for to stabilize it did not work for me. Bullet published 1:7 TR and I had 1:8 TR.</p><p>Here were the results…</p><p></p><p>[MEDIA=youtube]9yOzSa-d_zg[/MEDIA]</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Steve is right. Ballistics degree is a forensic science degree.</p><p></p><p>The two people I know with PH.D's in fluid dynamics and environmental fluid mechanics, who shoot with me occasionally, find ballistics pretty elementary level mathematics. They're not wrong. The modern bullet (and other rifle projectiles) design has pretty much remained the same since the 1830's (with a million design tweaks from then to now). Ballistic mathematical models were available by WWII. Pretty effective during Desert Storm. And we have those mathematical models in the form of Apps in 2023.</p><p></p><p>Attempting to break the laws of physics can be fun but I'd start by trusting old data first.</p><p></p><p>Someone get back to me about minimal TR or faster.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Zen Archery, post: 2825778, member: 60545"] Correct me if I’m wrong but aren’t TR based off minimal TR or faster? Your 1/2 TR should be well within stabilization range. As for faster velocity for to stabilize it did not work for me. Bullet published 1:7 TR and I had 1:8 TR. Here were the results… [MEDIA=youtube]9yOzSa-d_zg[/MEDIA] Steve is right. Ballistics degree is a forensic science degree. The two people I know with PH.D's in fluid dynamics and environmental fluid mechanics, who shoot with me occasionally, find ballistics pretty elementary level mathematics. They're not wrong. The modern bullet (and other rifle projectiles) design has pretty much remained the same since the 1830's (with a million design tweaks from then to now). Ballistic mathematical models were available by WWII. Pretty effective during Desert Storm. And we have those mathematical models in the form of Apps in 2023. Attempting to break the laws of physics can be fun but I’d start by trusting old data first. Someone get back to me about minimal TR or faster. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Bullet stability
Top