EXPRESS
Well-Known Member
I'm looking at the Canon vixia hf r52, which has a 32x optical zoom and 57X extended zoom, and I'm trying to figure out if it's worthwhile buying a digiscoping adapter and using any camera or if a 32X-57X zoom is going to work well enough at the end of its range.
The people who know enough about the topic will guess that I don't know anything about it, but my logic is that 32X in a scope or spotting scope is usually enough to clearly see what's going on.
I have a Redfield 20-40 spotting scope which while decent, probably isn't going to give the best clarity, hence being a little hesitant with the digiscope idea.
Which would work better?
The people who know enough about the topic will guess that I don't know anything about it, but my logic is that 32X in a scope or spotting scope is usually enough to clearly see what's going on.
I have a Redfield 20-40 spotting scope which while decent, probably isn't going to give the best clarity, hence being a little hesitant with the digiscope idea.
Which would work better?