Hi guys,
I have read posts on this site that discussed Barnes bullets "actual" vs. "advertised" B.C's. Has anyone used their 165 XLC or X BT's? They show a BC of .505, which is higher than their 168 TSX or or XLC of an advertised .476.
I'm curious if they have worked well for anyone and if they really are that aerodynamic for their weight.
Neal
I have read posts on this site that discussed Barnes bullets "actual" vs. "advertised" B.C's. Has anyone used their 165 XLC or X BT's? They show a BC of .505, which is higher than their 168 TSX or or XLC of an advertised .476.
I'm curious if they have worked well for anyone and if they really are that aerodynamic for their weight.
Neal
