7MM Rem Mag, H4350, and 154gr SST's starting point?

blm771

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
5
Location
Thornton, colorado
I am looking for a good starting point for a 7mag using H4350 and 154gr hornady SST. I have loaded up 5 so far with 58gr of H4350 and CCI mag primers, but have not shot it yet. am i on the right track on this one or should I pull them and start over. I would appreciate all of your thoughts in this matter. gun)

Brian
 
Last edited:
H-4350 will work, but not as good as other powders. 58 gns of H-4350 has a case filing ratio of 87-88%. A slower powder would be better. Quickload is showing about 50,000 psi. RL-22 worked well in a friends 7mm Rem Mag.
 
Thanks for the reply, I'm still kinda new to the reloading thing so please bear with me. At 87-88% fill with 58gr of H4350 I have some room to go up a little bit for more speed possibly correct? I do have some RL19 as well, what are your thoughts on that?
 
A general but not hard fast rule is to have case capacity at 95-100%. This typically gives best accuracy. A slower powder will probally improve velocity and accuracy.
 
Ok, I now have some results of my loads.

*NOTE* Speeds are based on factory ammo posted velocity on cheap federal box of 3110fps with 150gr hot cores hitting at the same height as hand loaded ammo on average @ 100yds.

58gr loads did pretty good with .960" 5 shot group at about 3000fps

59grn of h4350 yielded a 3 shot group of .4660" at again about 3000fps :)

60gr opened up enough that i did not even want to measure it...lol

so that having been said i believe the winner is the 59gr load of H4350 with the 154gr Hornady SST's should make a decent Elk round within reasonable distances, don't y'all think?
 
Ok, I now have some results of my loads.

*NOTE* Speeds are based on factory ammo posted velocity on cheap federal box of 3110fps with 150gr hot cores hitting at the same height as hand loaded ammo on average @ 100yds.

58gr loads did pretty good with .960" 5 shot group at about 3000fps

59grn of h4350 yielded a 3 shot group of .4660" at again about 3000fps :)

60gr opened up enough that i did not even want to measure it...lol

so that having been said i believe the winner is the 59gr load of H4350 with the 154gr Hornady SST's should make a decent Elk round within reasonable distances, don't y'all think?

yes,but try 58.5 may tighten even more my old load now im shooting H-1000 68 grn. 150 sierra match king
 
Some of my measurements:

150 gr Ballistic tip moly 3.4" 66 gr H4350
3259 fps
3375 fps
3333 fps


Work up
Hodgdon web site:
162 gr HDY SPBT H4350 3.290" 58.0 gr 2799 fps 49,400 CUP

My work up H4350 162 gr interlock moly 3.34"
62.8 gr ok difficult primer insertion
65 gr ok difficult primer insertion
66. 5 gr ok difficult primer insertion
67.0 gr ok difficult primer insertion
67.5 gr easier primer insertion ...end work up


What does it all mean?
Backing off 4% powder charge from highest long brass life load would be 64.3 gr which is 11% higher than max published load.

There are white lies, lies, **** lies, and then there is 7mmRM published load data.
 
Some of my measurements:

150 gr Ballistic tip moly 3.4" 66 gr H4350
3259 fps
3375 fps
3333 fps


Work up
Hodgdon web site:
162 gr HDY SPBT H4350 3.290" 58.0 gr 2799 fps 49,400 CUP

My work up H4350 162 gr interlock moly 3.34"
62.8 gr ok difficult primer insertion
65 gr ok difficult primer insertion
66. 5 gr ok difficult primer insertion
67.0 gr ok difficult primer insertion
67.5 gr easier primer insertion ...end work up


What does it all mean?
Backing off 4% powder charge from highest long brass life load would be 64.3 gr which is 11% higher than max published load.

There are white lies, lies, **** lies, and then there is 7mmRM published load data.

Published load data isnt for moly bullets its a whole differant ball game.Which I'm sure you know just throwing that out there.
 
Here is the pic of the best results i had. I estimate the speed to be closer to 2900 than 3000...just guessing as i did not have a chrony at the time. should have stopped at the 3rd shot. pretty sure the 4th one was because of me and not the load.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2914.jpg
    IMG_2914.jpg
    60.7 KB · Views: 257
Warning! This thread is more than 12 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.
Top