WEATHERBY460
Well-Known Member
308 Win with a 26" barrel, shooting 168 Bergers Hybrids, how far should this shoot accurately?
Thanks
Thanks
the 308 is a great round for long range shooting its been proven over and over 26 in barrel will give you no excuses on velocity yea it doesn't need 26in but if you got it than shoot it why not.This is not meant as a criticism, but really is just a question:
If you are going to put all that work and a 26 inch barrel on a gun, why not just use a 30-06 instead of a 308 win ? Maybe I am just old fashion, but it seems like the main advantage of the short action rounds easier bulk transport of ammo. After that, the long action rounds seem like better performers.
What am I missing ?
the 308 is a great round for long range shooting its been proven over and over 26 in barrel will give you no excuses on velocity yea it doesn't need 26in but if you got it than shoot it why not.
308 Win with a 26" barrel, shooting 168 Bergers Hybrids, how far should this shoot accurately?
Thanks
Umm, well 800+ is significantly more difficult for anything.I was good to about 6-7 hundred with the 168's. I took them further but it got significantly more difficult around 800+
I agree I actually think the 06 is far superior to the 308 but that's my opinion and buy saying that I probably just started a cartridge war but I love the debate anyway anyway I think that he already had the 308 26in so he's trying to get the most out of what he's got I could be wrong though....Thanks, what I meant actually is that my perception from reading is that under similar loading pressures, barrel length, and bullet choice, the 30-06 will give you an extra 100 FPS over a 308.
All this, at similar recoil, less than 1 inch longer overall length, and similar cost for both rifle and rounds.
100 FPS gain might not seem like much, but 1 000 yards is a long shot, at least to me.
I am not criticizing the 308 win, and yes it is proven, I am just curious if there is any other advantage over the 30-06 other than the logistics of carrying longer bullets. Of course I am assuming that a setup for 1 000 yard shots is a bolt action.
Umm, well 800+ is significantly more difficult for anything.
Got a guy at one of the LR ranges that shoots 308 to 1000 every month. 168s but SMKs not Hybrids.
To divergent from the original topic.Sure, thats what ftr is. The 175 smk is the typical weapon of choice for ftr, and lately the 210's and 215's are becoming the norm. The 168 is the dog of the 30 cals, its fine for a medium range hunting bullet but in my opinion its the worst bullet you can shoot lr with a 308. The 185 vld gave me significantly less wind drift than the 168, and with the 215 hybrid i get half of the drift i had with the 185 at sea level.
Shoot the 168 and get back to me on the difference between 600 and 800 yards. I shot about 2000 of em figuring it out.
To divergent from the original topic.
While you are correct about the past and current trend for FTR, I shoot F-Open. The other guy shoots FTR.
I have been meaning to try the 185 VLD's in my .308 as well. I might have to give that a try soon.