300 wby to 30-378 wby

SSM, the bolt face would have to be opened up, which is the easy part. I am not sure if the action length on your Sendero will work with the 30-378. The case length of the 30-378 is .293" longer than the 300Wby. If your action will accommodate the larger cartridge the chamber will clean up without any barrel set-back. A qualified gunsmith should be able to measure your action and tell you if this re-chamber will work.
 
Some caveats.....Several years ago, I read that bolt thrust on the .378 based cartridges is pushing the 700's safe limit. However, the MK V Wby 9 lug rifle is factory chambered for the .378 based cartridges and has centerfeed mag boxes, followers, and .378 extractors available as parts. The 700 is factory chambered for the RUM cartridges, but the mag box inside length is 3.7" and the MK V .378 box is 3.8". The extra length is useful. Also don't know if the RUM box and follower will work on the bigger belted case. Both bolt faces can be opened up from Std Mag case head diameter, but not sure if the Sako or M-16 extractor conversion will work on the larger .378 case head.

Bottom line, for a .30 x .378 I would start out with a 9 lug MK V action, not a Rem 700. However, the .300 RUM might clean up the .300 Wby chamber. Worth checking on, and the .300 Wby bolt face in the Remington works on the RUM case head without modification..........Oh yeah, RUM brass is expensive, but the Big Wby brass is insane.

Good luck, Tom
 
Some caveats.....Several years ago, I read that bolt thrust on the .378 based cartridges is pushing the 700's safe limit. However, the MK V Wby 9 lug rifle is factory chambered for the .378 based cartridges and has centerfeed mag boxes, followers, and .378 extractors available as parts. The 700 is factory chambered for the RUM cartridges, but the mag box inside length is 3.7" and the MK V .378 box is 3.8". The extra length is useful. Also don't know if the RUM box and follower will work on the bigger belted case. Both bolt faces can be opened up from Std Mag case head diameter, but not sure if the Sako or M-16 extractor conversion will work on the larger .378 case head.

Bottom line, for a .30 x .378 I would start out with a 9 lug MK V action, not a Rem 700. However, the .300 RUM might clean up the .300 Wby chamber. Worth checking on, and the .300 Wby bolt face in the Remington works on the RUM case head without modification..........Oh yeah, RUM brass is expensive, but the Big Wby brass is insane.

Good luck, Tom

The maximum pressure list for a 300 wby is 65,000 psi, for a 30-378 it is 63,817. That I can find. How would the pressure on the bolt be greater with less chamber pressure?? Thanks for any info.
 
SSM, the bolt face would have to be opened up, which is the easy part. I am not sure if the action length on your Sendero will work with the 30-378. The case length of the 30-378 is .293" longer than the 300Wby. If your action will accommodate the larger cartridge the chamber will clean up without any barrel set-back. A qualified gunsmith should be able to measure your action and tell you if this re-chamber will work.

Thank you.
 
How would the pressure on the bolt be greater with less chamber pressure?? Thanks for any info.

Because the bolt face is larger. Using your numbers it would go up about 17%.

You also have the issue of a thin barrel tenon with 1.062" threads.
 
Edd makes a good point about tenon wall thickness. Both the Remington 700 and the MK V have 1.062" major diameter x 16 tpi tenons.

In my opinion, thread fit between the barrel tenon and the receiver is critical. A very close thread fit helps the receiver ring support the barrel tenon when torqued up. No scientific proof, just makes sense to me. I don't think factory barrels have the thread fit that custom barrels have (or should have), but they are torqued up hard! Plus, some Remington barrels have some kind of nasty mung in the threads. Don't know what its purpose is (maybe a non-compressible thread filler)?, but it makes them a bitch to get out.

Tom
 
Warning! This thread is more than 11 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Recent Posts

Top