Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
AR15/10 Rifles
300 BO, 6.5 G, or 6 ARC?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="QuietTexan" data-source="post: 2752120" data-attributes="member: 116181"><p>Agree 1000%. It was meant to to shoot subsonic loads inside the dimensions/parts of the mil-spec M-16/M-4 receiver set. Nothing else. Any other benefits are tangential to the design goals of the cartridge. I love it for what it is, but I know what it's not also.</p><p></p><p>15-20 years ago we didn't have the options for bolt faces that we do today. So 300 BO and 6x45 were awesome because they ran with basically no modifications other than a new barrel and required no parts other than standardized weights.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="QuietTexan, post: 2752120, member: 116181"] Agree 1000%. It was meant to to shoot subsonic loads inside the dimensions/parts of the mil-spec M-16/M-4 receiver set. Nothing else. Any other benefits are tangential to the design goals of the cartridge. I love it for what it is, but I know what it's not also. 15-20 years ago we didn't have the options for bolt faces that we do today. So 300 BO and 6x45 were awesome because they ran with basically no modifications other than a new barrel and required no parts other than standardized weights. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
AR15/10 Rifles
300 BO, 6.5 G, or 6 ARC?
Top