Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
.280 AI controversy explained ...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="yawn" data-source="post: 834532" data-attributes="member: 13540"><p>They are some of the questions we are looking to answer arnt they?</p><p> I see the orignal post by gun talk as being along the same lines as everything else based on diagrams and measuerments . Then it seems they did some actual testing and found no difference. I dont see how thats " smoke and mirrors"</p><p> I also don't see anyone telling you that there is no difference between your chamber nosler ai brass, youve proven that there is . The questions are do you have an exact original ackley chamber or is it a little out of spec? Do I have an original ackley chamber as Iv been told or has the builder got it wrong and I have an saami chamber? Is there in fact a third addition to the discussion where the now saami spec was adopted by gun builders long before the saami registered it therefore clouding the waters even more? </p><p>Cockrofts report is interesting as his cases got longer by .014 but he still had to shave the case holder to get the shoulder contact as if the cases where still a little short?</p><p> </p><p>Its all interesting but end of the day if we check headspace,fireform correctly and set the sizing die up properly then its a non issue isnt it?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="yawn, post: 834532, member: 13540"] They are some of the questions we are looking to answer arnt they? I see the orignal post by gun talk as being along the same lines as everything else based on diagrams and measuerments . Then it seems they did some actual testing and found no difference. I dont see how thats " smoke and mirrors" I also don't see anyone telling you that there is no difference between your chamber nosler ai brass, youve proven that there is . The questions are do you have an exact original ackley chamber or is it a little out of spec? Do I have an original ackley chamber as Iv been told or has the builder got it wrong and I have an saami chamber? Is there in fact a third addition to the discussion where the now saami spec was adopted by gun builders long before the saami registered it therefore clouding the waters even more? Cockrofts report is interesting as his cases got longer by .014 but he still had to shave the case holder to get the shoulder contact as if the cases where still a little short? Its all interesting but end of the day if we check headspace,fireform correctly and set the sizing die up properly then its a non issue isnt it? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
.280 AI controversy explained ...
Top