Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
.280 AI controversy explained ...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="yawn" data-source="post: 1528858" data-attributes="member: 13540"><p>What I found hilarious was the dragging up of a five year old thread involving an issue that is little more than a light zephyr in an egg cup and has been done to death. . It was two lines with 24 words, not one of which referenced you or anything from your post so NO I didnt call you or your post anything, you have that completely wrong. I do however confess to getting a chuckle from your last post.</p><p> Yes there is only one correct dimension for Mr. Ackley's "traditional" 280 A.I. I have never said other wise. Its the constant in this discussion, the control. I understand it perfectly. It is the SAAMI spec that is and has always been in question.</p><p>I also understand the Maths , that image has been posted so many times now its fading and no I wont argue maths because I agree it shows a .014 difference. I believed it, its what got me into this conversation many years ago. But I'm no longer interested in the maths, the theory. That's the beginning of the process, what normally follows is the experiment that proves or disproves the theory, the practical, in this case the physical chamber. Heres the issue, the physical SAAMI chamber when constructed properly and head spaced correctly is not a clean translation of the maths we are seeing , there is a disconnect somewhere, the .014 difference from the original ackley is not there. Now you claim that its all unknown chambers and gauges , and gunsmithtalk is wrong and Im wrong and no one understands but for that to be relevant the chambers from cooper, kimber and the customs Iv checked , the dies , gauges, the gear used by gunsmithtalk etc and all the nosler brass would have to not only have a magic error but the same error of the same amount possibly working in two differnt dimensins at the same time. . What are the chances?</p><p>But of course that must be the case because, well, you've done the maths.</p><p> So carry on. Ridicule seems to be your best debating technique so let rip.</p><p> As Iv said before, Im not interested in convincing anyone of anything, Im simply putting out what Iv found and suggesting people check for themselves. </p><p></p><p>Merry Christmas and a happy new year to all.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="yawn, post: 1528858, member: 13540"] What I found hilarious was the dragging up of a five year old thread involving an issue that is little more than a light zephyr in an egg cup and has been done to death. . It was two lines with 24 words, not one of which referenced you or anything from your post so NO I didnt call you or your post anything, you have that completely wrong. I do however confess to getting a chuckle from your last post. Yes there is only one correct dimension for Mr. Ackley's "traditional" 280 A.I. I have never said other wise. Its the constant in this discussion, the control. I understand it perfectly. It is the SAAMI spec that is and has always been in question. I also understand the Maths , that image has been posted so many times now its fading and no I wont argue maths because I agree it shows a .014 difference. I believed it, its what got me into this conversation many years ago. But I'm no longer interested in the maths, the theory. That's the beginning of the process, what normally follows is the experiment that proves or disproves the theory, the practical, in this case the physical chamber. Heres the issue, the physical SAAMI chamber when constructed properly and head spaced correctly is not a clean translation of the maths we are seeing , there is a disconnect somewhere, the .014 difference from the original ackley is not there. Now you claim that its all unknown chambers and gauges , and gunsmithtalk is wrong and Im wrong and no one understands but for that to be relevant the chambers from cooper, kimber and the customs Iv checked , the dies , gauges, the gear used by gunsmithtalk etc and all the nosler brass would have to not only have a magic error but the same error of the same amount possibly working in two differnt dimensins at the same time. . What are the chances? But of course that must be the case because, well, you've done the maths. So carry on. Ridicule seems to be your best debating technique so let rip. As Iv said before, Im not interested in convincing anyone of anything, Im simply putting out what Iv found and suggesting people check for themselves. Merry Christmas and a happy new year to all. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
.280 AI controversy explained ...
Top