adam32
Well-Known Member
Yeah, I'm jumping in. Sorry guys this is may not go well but I'm trying to understand.
adam32 it's not the message, it the method.
If you are trying to say, beware of barrel burners, there is no issue with your position.
If you are trying to say, your stupid, the design is stupid, then there is an issue.
The first one is constructive, open to discussion of the pros and cons of your position and sharing knowledge and experience and IMO very contributory to a forum.
The second is negative, insulting and closed to any discussion of pros and cons depicts a general a 'use must do it my way' attitude and IMO is very damaging to the forum concept.
Just asking and trying to understand.
I'm the first to jump on the "barrel burner" bandwagon, I think overbore is great. I think the big case, small bore stuff is awesome when they last at least 500-600 rounds. I'm just saying there's gotta be something up with the Nosler case, I know some people can burn up a .308 in 50 rounds by treating it poorly but there's been more then 1 person burning up a Nosler in under 200 rounds. I don't have the answer but when a .264 Win Mag will do all the Nosler will, just 25 yards shorter and is proven to last 1000+ rounds then I would personally go that route. Or even a 6.5x284 that is also considered a "barrel burner"...
The reason I asked "Why" he is set on it, is I'm curious if he saw the Nosler ads where they hype up the "flat for 415 yards" slogan. I'm not trying to be rude, he asked about the 26 nosler and will get both questions and answers in return.