Trm82
Well-Known Member
I believe the 115 Gr tsx in 25 cal has a higher BC then either of the lighter ttsx 7mm's that you listed.
Actually no it does not.
I believe the 115 Gr tsx in 25 cal has a higher BC then either of the lighter ttsx 7mm's that you listed.
Actually no it does not.
I stand corrected. My first statement was based off of midwayusa that states .429 BC for the 115 tsx. The Barnes website only lists the 115 tsx at .335.
Definitely indicates Barnes is a poor choice for high BC's in 25 caliber.
I know this is old, but 7-08 120 ttsx dont have higher BC's than many 115/120 .257 bullets. ??Unless you absolutely need a 25 cal why wouldn't you just get a 7-08 and shoot the 110ttsx or 120 ttsx ? I have a finnlite with a 20.5" bbl that shoots the 120 ttsx at 3200fps. The small 7mm bullets would have a better bc then the 25 cal bullets.
Its a poor choice for BC in any caliber!I stand corrected. My first statement was based off of midwayusa that states .429 BC for the 115 tsx. The Barnes website only lists the 115 tsx at .335.
Definitely indicates Barnes is a poor choice for high BC's in 25 caliber.
BC means almost nothing at ranges under 500 yards. For hunting, many many more animals killed at less than 500 than beyond. Regardless if this is a LR hunting forum or not, 400-500 yards is still LR to most.Its a poor choice for BC in any caliber!
Exactly, I was just correcting the Barnes BC thing.BC means almost nothing at ranges under 500 yards. For hunting, many many more animals killed at less than 500 than beyond. Regardless if this is a LR hunting forum or not, 400-500 yards is still LR to most.
Need has nothing to do with it. Want is the correct word.Already have one and shoots 139/140 gr better than 120's. At least what Ive tried so far but valid point. thanks
...just saw the .25 souper and was intrigued by it.