Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Suppressors
22 suppressor?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TucsonFX4" data-source="post: 3055987" data-attributes="member: 126198"><p>While I understand the premise you raise, does it apply to this comparison? I've not been around the Sparrow, so I genuinely don't know. I own the Switchback, and bought it because of the modularity and design, and believed the performance it touted. I could have had the wool pulled over my eyes, so I'm asking a genuine question. </p><p></p><p>Not withstanding generally small differences in performance for baffle design etc, volume is generally the biggest differentiator in performance. So assuming the size comparison is similar between the Switchback and Sparrow, or if it's different then equally accounting for the expected performance delta, is the Switchback a poor performer compared to the Sparrow?</p><p></p><p>I've been impressed with the Switchback, and it's hard for me to imagine another 22 silencer being that much of a better performer. Perhaps lighter, perhaps relative performance improvements in relation to size, perhaps cheaper, but is the Switchback a poor performing silencer? To clarify, I'm not an expert silencer user. I'm curious if it is truly a poor choice as stated, or a general statement unfairly applied to the Switchback because of its design.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TucsonFX4, post: 3055987, member: 126198"] While I understand the premise you raise, does it apply to this comparison? I’ve not been around the Sparrow, so I genuinely don’t know. I own the Switchback, and bought it because of the modularity and design, and believed the performance it touted. I could have had the wool pulled over my eyes, so I’m asking a genuine question. Not withstanding generally small differences in performance for baffle design etc, volume is generally the biggest differentiator in performance. So assuming the size comparison is similar between the Switchback and Sparrow, or if it’s different then equally accounting for the expected performance delta, is the Switchback a poor performer compared to the Sparrow? I’ve been impressed with the Switchback, and it’s hard for me to imagine another 22 silencer being that much of a better performer. Perhaps lighter, perhaps relative performance improvements in relation to size, perhaps cheaper, but is the Switchback a poor performing silencer? To clarify, I’m not an expert silencer user. I’m curious if it is truly a poor choice as stated, or a general statement unfairly applied to the Switchback because of its design. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Suppressors
22 suppressor?
Top