The old 25-06 Remington and 270 Winchester shot flatter than 6.5 CM

The people running Remington are a bunch of idiots...every once in a while they hit the lottery with something like the 300 RUM, but otherwise they are horrible at catering to the long range community - from support for good cartridges they developed in the past made better now with higher bc bullets, to making rifles with faster twist rates - they suck. My user name used to be Remmy700 or something like that - I had a huge man crush on them. They made me change my username.
They even screwed up the Rum. It nearly died for almost a decade and Rum shooters were screwed when it came to finding brass and decent factory ammo for a long time.

Fortunately as other super mag's were starting to get a lot of hype people rediscovered it and we're back to being blessed with ample ammo and brass.
 
They even screwed up the Rum. It nearly died for almost a decade and Rum shooters were screwed when it came to finding brass and decent factory ammo for a long time.

Fortunately as other super mag's were starting to get a lot of hype people rediscovered it and we're back to being blessed with ample ammo and brass.

True - good point. I was digging for something postive in the last 2 decades from Remington...
 
https://ronspomeroutdoors.com/blog/25-06-remington-beats-6-5-creedmoor/

Best part is you have no problem finding brass or loaded ammo since they are not proprietary at this point. You can find everything from Remington Core-Lokt to boutique exotic loaded ammo. Plenty of new and used rifles to chose from as well. No matter who goes out of bussiness someone will always be making brass for these and chambering rifles for these you can not say that about the 6.5CM or the 6.5 PRC.
The 6.5 CM and PRC are only under-achieving clones of the 260 Rem and 6.5 Rem Mag. Hornady-Hype and lots of advertising has them in the spotlight for now. I own all 4 of these and love all of them. And in the end a better mouse trap has in my opinion has Not arrived.
 
The 6.5 CM and PRC are only under-achieving clones of the 260 Rem and 6.5 Rem Mag. Hornady-Hype and lots of advertising has them in the spotlight for now. I own all 4 of these and love all of them. And in the end a better mouse trap has in my opinion has Not arrived.
you say underachieving but some argue the opposite...for example, regardless if a belt is a big deal or not, many people hate belted cases so a big negative for 6.5 rem mag and while the 260 rem does beat the 6.5cm in speed (typically)...the 6.5cm case is better designed for semi-autos and supposedly more efficient. Basically any cartridge you can think of these days, was based off something else. Hornady may be "hyping" their rounds...but they are also winning. PRC is too new to really tell for staying power but the 6.5cm isn't going anywhere. It has been out already for over a decade and has so many rifle companies producing rifles (especially with the proper twist for long range hunting), it wont go anywhere. The downfall of the 260 is very little factory rifle offerings, and the ones that were offered, came with terrible twists for long range shooting. Also, very little in terms of factory ammo. 6.5cm has shelves of ammo a tons of choices. It makes a perfect hunting rifle for a youth, small framed person, women and full framed men. Low recoil. Personally, I bet more 6.5cm are purchased for deer hunting for youths than 243s now. Just my two cents.
 
Ditto - I love my 270 wsm!
Hello rustyshackleford, please read my post again, especially the last sentence. I wrote: "I'll go out on a limb here and probably get beat up pretty bad, but I will state that "any caliber that is sub 30 caliber" (.257 to .284) will be hard pressed to beat the performance of the .270WSM; I suspect that I'll get some flack from the 26-28 Nosler crowd here:rolleyes:! This doesn't mean that it is the catch all, do all caliber, just that it is a pretty good performer for just about any long range shooting on game.". I didn't say the .270WSM is the catch all, do all caliber just that one would be hard pressed to beat its performance, there are good calibers that will outperform it as well. From the Nosler Reloading Guide#8 all comparison made with a 140gr bullet: .270WSM-3200fps, 28 Nosler 3500fps, 7mmRemMag 3300fps, 7mm WSM 3200FPS, 26 Nosler 3200fps, .270Win 3000fps, .264WinMag 3000fps, 6.5-.284 3000fps, 6.5-06 2900fps, 260 Remington 2800fps, 6.5 Creedmore 2750fps, 6.5 Grendell (125 gr bullet) 2500fps. These ballistics were from 24 and 26 inch barrels, the 26 inch barrels were mostly Wiseman proof barrels. With the exception of the 28 Nosler the .270WSM holds its own with the rest, and what I wrote is a generalization nothing more. And......something that I'd like to address here about the person (won't call anyone names, however.......) in reference to the "ole guy who is stuck in his ways" !! Statements such as this really --ss me off because it shows a lack of respect for a person. Apparently whoever is making a commentary like this is young, and as such making a statement as harsh as this is like the guy who gives comments on how good their Creedmore is on killing an elk at a 1000 yards, but has never shot an elk!! With that I'm going to make a comment: Thus because you are young you are not there/here yet (ole), so you really do not know what you are talking about when you make such a comparison of comparing "ole" as something inferior!! I've been shooting since I was eight years old, hunting since I was fifteen years old, thirty years law enforcement, five years SWAT, fifteen years armorer, fifteen years tactical firearms instructor. "The only source of knowledge is experience." Albert Einstein. I'm seventy-two years "ole", sharp as a tack, and I consider myself one of the lucky ones because I made it this far!! I'm done with the dissertation, said my piece!
dido
 
I don't usually say much on this site but I read lots. This Creedmoor stuff is getting boring. I m with someone else that said don't open this Creedmoor debate but we do . I guess I think I might miss some truth. Went this 6.5 Creedmoor start to win at 1000 yard matches. I think I will look closer . I have.22-250 ,6 ppc ,6 br .243,6xc ,. 270's , 6.5 x 284 Norma , 308 Norma , 30-338 and more customs that I don't need to mention . I would never consider trading in my 6.5 x.284 Norma for the Creedmoor bandwagon . I think the people that are hooked are not very well experienced with some of the kill power that we already have . It reminds me of fishing gear they come out with new colours or sizes of spoons every year as a way to get our money after they premote them to death. You see they know we are creatures of wanting to not get out fished bye something we don't have . Yes I don't have one yet , show me the results. Just had to say my 2 cents worth finally
 
I don't usually say much on this site but I read lots. This Creedmoor stuff is getting boring. I m with someone else that said don't open this Creedmoor debate but we do . I guess I think I might miss some truth. Went this 6.5 Creedmoor start to win at 1000 yard matches. I think I will look closer . I have.22-250 ,6 ppc ,6 br .243,6xc ,. 270's , 6.5 x 284 Norma , 308 Norma , 30-338 and more customs that I don't need to mention . I would never consider trading in my 6.5 x.284 Norma for the Creedmoor bandwagon . I think the people that are hooked are not very well experienced with some of the kill power that we already have . It reminds me of fishing gear they come out with new colours or sizes of spoons every year as a way to get our money after they premote them to death. You see they know we are creatures of wanting to not get out fished bye something we don't have . Yes I don't have one yet , show me the results. Just had to say my 2 cents worth finally

It is becoming more and more popular due to its ballistics and more importantly, the military recently adopting it as a round. It's not going away anytime soon.
 
Last edited:
Spomer is full of crap. He made a video claiming the 6.5CM outperformed a 300WM. His basis was a 6.5 with a high BC hunting bullet and a Win Mag with a heavy Core-lokt. Not what I'd baselines and normalized comparisons.
He also has compared a heavy for caliber bullet in one cartridge to a magnum cartridge using a light for caliber bullet in the other cartridge to bolster his argument --but its "apples to oranges" and not a valid comparison.
 
And EVERYONE still posting has been OUTSMARTED by Hornady once more!
You are still talking about their CM and that's just what they want!!
I prefer the ignore it and hope it disappears approach..Give it a Rest!
And I still wouldn't own one...I hope it goes the way of the Dodo or the Winchester WSSM's
 
Top