Recent content by LastShot300

We are talking different things here, you argue over versatility from guesstimating under field conditions and my post was about DA accuracy itself.

Not getting the argument. DA if properly done in any software, must yield 100% the same results as the usual atmospheric parameters. No reason at all to do not use or trust it, unless the software is of poor quality.

Makes sense. Exterior ballistics is vital for target shooting but hunting is another thing, we need to start to think about terminal ballistics, bullet performance, etc.

o_Oo_O ugly as hell.

+100

Is that a plane builder company? :D:DNever heard of it before LOL Advice taken!

Barnes TTSX all day long, but Accubonds are GTG too. Let's say it's hard to fail with a well placed shot with most bullets, the trick comes when hitting bones and that's what separate the really good ones from the mainstream offerings.

Because the real good ballistics engines are far from being cheap, the usual crap is useless (Leica et al) and maybe Nikon management don't see the need to spend a dime on a good one.

My hunting experince with the Nosler's BTips (.243 and .300) range from bad to worst. There are much, much better options for hunting bullets around.

Looks like a very nice and well organized shoot out just a little bit on the far side of the Moon!

:D I know! a truthful statement not to be overlooked

Good points, but not a real thing all the time, there are designs and ...well...designs. Nevertheless the ZCO looks like a winner, time will tell.

Probably no real reason, other than being a little different and cool.

LOL!! say no more.

I guess there is no solution other than blowing it:D