Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Support
Open new ticket
Knowledge base
Search articles
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
Latest activity
Account upgrades
Register
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
If you are being asked to change your password, and unsure how to do it, follow these instructions.
Click here
Forums
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Clem Bronkoski's latest activity
C
Clem Bronkoski
reacted to
TucsonFX4's post
in the thread
G1 vs G7
with
Like
.
Tuesday at 6:42 PM
C
Clem Bronkoski
replied to the thread
G1 vs G7
.
I don't think so memtb. You still have to shoot to determine actual drop. Even your own statements above enforce that...an assumption...
Tuesday at 6:40 PM
C
Clem Bronkoski
reacted to
med358-boise's post
in the thread
G1 vs G7
with
Like
.
I would add that all published BCs are just that published. BCs will be slightly different in every rifle based on velocity and some...
Tuesday at 6:33 PM
C
Clem Bronkoski
replied to the thread
G1 vs G7
.
thanks med. That's really close to the .27 BC I used as a guesstimate for the G7 BC. I backtracking your numbers the G7 BC is .26
Tuesday at 4:56 PM
C
Clem Bronkoski
reacted to
Ridgerunner665's post
in the thread
When to use G1 vs G7
with
Like
.
I don't think ANY modern spitzer type bullet fits the G1 profile...it looks like an artillery shell...no modern bullets look like that...
Tuesday at 4:51 PM
C
Clem Bronkoski
replied to the thread
G1 vs G7
.
I was using the Hornady ballistic calculator and with G1 @ 800 yds with .450 bc my MOA adj is 18.1. Using the same BC and G7 its...
Tuesday at 4:41 PM
C
Clem Bronkoski
replied to the thread
G1 vs G7
.
thanks .308" 180 TSX, 1:10, 3105 fps., 1.94" sight ht
Tuesday at 4:35 PM
C
Clem Bronkoski
replied to the thread
Ran 2 Satterlee test today
.
I don't suggest you try IMR4064. If you want to try an IMR powder try IMR4350. But IMO I believe you'll have better success with H1000.
Tuesday at 3:35 PM
C
Clem Bronkoski
replied to the thread
Ran 2 Satterlee test today
.
This is where I get the heartburn from guys saying it doesn't work. It seems they are using it and basing their opinions on the wrong...
Tuesday at 3:32 PM
C
Clem Bronkoski
reacted to
ShtrRdy's post
in the thread
Ran 2 Satterlee test today
with
Haha
.
You must be a chosen one. I have not had good results trying it first and then refining the load. I'll find a load using an OCW...
Tuesday at 3:25 PM
C
Clem Bronkoski
reacted to
FireFlyFishing's post
in the thread
Ran 2 Satterlee test today
with
Haha
.
Hornady guys talk about it in this episode.
Tuesday at 3:25 PM
C
Clem Bronkoski
reacted to
ShtrRdy's post
in the thread
Ran 2 Satterlee test today
with
Sad
.
In case you didn't get the memo...... 🤪 ........ the so called "Satterlee test" doesn't always work. If you fired one cartridge at...
Tuesday at 3:24 PM
C
Clem Bronkoski
posted the thread
G1 vs G7
in
The Basics, Starting Out
.
Getting into this LR stuff and reading a lot about ballistics I read where an individual should use the G7 BC when shooting long range...
Tuesday at 3:20 PM
C
Clem Bronkoski
replied to the thread
Ran 2 Satterlee test today
.
Sure average of 2 shots in 0.5 gr increments: (GR - Vel); 77 - 2889, 77.5 - 2967, 78 - 2984. 78.5 - 2999, 79 - 2983, 79.5 - 3017, 80 -...
Tuesday at 3:07 PM
C
Clem Bronkoski
replied to the thread
Ran 2 Satterlee test today
.
2 rounds each charge.0.5 gr between each for 10 different charges. Chronograph 10' from muzzle. Distance doesn't matter as I was not...
Tuesday at 1:37 PM
Forums
Top