Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
Politics Of Hunting & Guns (NOT General Politics)
Why are we sending ammo to Ukraine?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jbs2014" data-source="post: 2530812" data-attributes="member: 94052"><p>LNG and other Ukrainian fossil fuels are not the main factor but they are a factor, especially if he want to degrade the Ukraine economically. Seizing the Ukrainian access to the Black Sea and Sea of Azov are definitely more important. However the Turks are the ones in control of the Black Sea as they control the choice bits. Regarding the barrier/buffer zone, remember why they took these areas (Eastern Europe & Soviet states)in the first place.</p><p></p><p>If NATO commits land forces he just may use a nuclear weapon. Then there is the possibility of a limited exchange, depending on Brandon and NATO.</p><p></p><p>He may have lost alot of his ground forces. Not sure if it's actually 1/3, that quantity has huge implications on a force's capability to conduct combat operations. And so far they are still conducting combat operations. One thing to remember about the Russians, they have never been reluctant to take massive casualties to achieve their aims.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jbs2014, post: 2530812, member: 94052"] LNG and other Ukrainian fossil fuels are not the main factor but they are a factor, especially if he want to degrade the Ukraine economically. Seizing the Ukrainian access to the Black Sea and Sea of Azov are definitely more important. However the Turks are the ones in control of the Black Sea as they control the choice bits. Regarding the barrier/buffer zone, remember why they took these areas (Eastern Europe & Soviet states)in the first place. If NATO commits land forces he just may use a nuclear weapon. Then there is the possibility of a limited exchange, depending on Brandon and NATO. He may have lost alot of his ground forces. Not sure if it’s actually 1/3, that quantity has huge implications on a force’s capability to conduct combat operations. And so far they are still conducting combat operations. One thing to remember about the Russians, they have never been reluctant to take massive casualties to achieve their aims. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
Politics Of Hunting & Guns (NOT General Politics)
Why are we sending ammo to Ukraine?
Top