Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Suppressors
Which one…
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="QuietTexan" data-source="post: 2688641" data-attributes="member: 116181"><p>The 338 would be softer shooting, simply because of the larger volume of the can spreading the gas out over a longer period of time. </p><p></p><p>But that said and having shot the 338 vs other Ultras, a well-fitting stock makes a bigger difference than which can is screwed on. To me recoil mitigation from a can is mostly about perception anyway - the reduction in sounds and blast alone makes a large subjective difference to most people. </p><p></p><p>I'm an unrepentant suppressor guy, but if recoil is a primary concern brakes will always be better.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="QuietTexan, post: 2688641, member: 116181"] The 338 would be softer shooting, simply because of the larger volume of the can spreading the gas out over a longer period of time. But that said and having shot the 338 vs other Ultras, a well-fitting stock makes a bigger difference than which can is screwed on. To me recoil mitigation from a can is mostly about perception anyway - the reduction in sounds and blast alone makes a large subjective difference to most people. I'm an unrepentant suppressor guy, but if recoil is a primary concern brakes will always be better. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Suppressors
Which one…
Top