Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
What do you think of this???
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="cowboy" data-source="post: 310056" data-attributes="member: 8833"><p>This has become a very hot topic here in Montana and now that it has hit the net - it'll get worse. There are a couple of things that are troubling or disappointing to me on this episode. One is the fact that G&F have taken a NO COMMENT attitude to most questions - I'm sure we can thank the legal profession for that. That leads to just an enourmous amount of speculation. Being as familiar as anyone who has been around our G&F and legal outfitters, as well as suspected illigal outfitters - this is going to be a weak case for the Mt. G&F. Pure speculation on my part - G&F probably were getting complaints from outfitters because this guy was helping sheep hunters for a long long time - maybe legally or illigally - the courts get to guess on the verdict. The 2nd most disappointing thing is the fact that after 39 tries I drew this very tag for this year and now I do not have the opportunity at this ram - but LIFE GOES ON and after I'm done typing this I'm headed to the barn to get ready for a 3 day scouting trip up to this area. As I get older I'm beginning to think that the increased attention to the B&C and P&Y scoring systems may be one of the many downfalls to hunting - if this ram scored 165 it wouldn't even have made the papers - but I'd still be mad as hell and want to know WHY?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="cowboy, post: 310056, member: 8833"] This has become a very hot topic here in Montana and now that it has hit the net - it'll get worse. There are a couple of things that are troubling or disappointing to me on this episode. One is the fact that G&F have taken a NO COMMENT attitude to most questions - I'm sure we can thank the legal profession for that. That leads to just an enourmous amount of speculation. Being as familiar as anyone who has been around our G&F and legal outfitters, as well as suspected illigal outfitters - this is going to be a weak case for the Mt. G&F. Pure speculation on my part - G&F probably were getting complaints from outfitters because this guy was helping sheep hunters for a long long time - maybe legally or illigally - the courts get to guess on the verdict. The 2nd most disappointing thing is the fact that after 39 tries I drew this very tag for this year and now I do not have the opportunity at this ram - but LIFE GOES ON and after I'm done typing this I'm headed to the barn to get ready for a 3 day scouting trip up to this area. As I get older I'm beginning to think that the increased attention to the B&C and P&Y scoring systems may be one of the many downfalls to hunting - if this ram scored 165 it wouldn't even have made the papers - but I'd still be mad as hell and want to know WHY? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
What do you think of this???
Top