Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
General Discussion
Sig Sauer KILO 2200 Laser Rangefinder Review
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="veezer" data-source="post: 1292395" data-attributes="member: 29560"><p>I have a 2000 that is complete junk. It will not range anything past 900 and only reads to 900 every now and then. I sent it back to Sig and after 4 weeks they still don't know what is going on because you send optics back to New Hampshire and then they send them to their "optics facility" in Oregon and apparently the two don't communicate well at all. Pretty **** sorry service if you ask me. </p><p></p><p>This is not the first Kilo that I have seen/heard about that had issues. Apparently, all the ones you hear about or see videos of that range out to 2000 yards on a stop sign are few and far between. Just like the author stated, most rangefinders are junk.</p><p></p><p>One of my shooting buddies had a 2000 that would range out to 1500 on good days but never past that. He sold it hoping the new 2200 would be better. Guess what....same issues just in a new package.</p><p></p><p>I have used Leica rangefinders and they are spot on every time. At twice the price, they should be so it looks like you get what you pay for.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="veezer, post: 1292395, member: 29560"] I have a 2000 that is complete junk. It will not range anything past 900 and only reads to 900 every now and then. I sent it back to Sig and after 4 weeks they still don't know what is going on because you send optics back to New Hampshire and then they send them to their "optics facility" in Oregon and apparently the two don't communicate well at all. Pretty **** sorry service if you ask me. This is not the first Kilo that I have seen/heard about that had issues. Apparently, all the ones you hear about or see videos of that range out to 2000 yards on a stop sign are few and far between. Just like the author stated, most rangefinders are junk. One of my shooting buddies had a 2000 that would range out to 1500 on good days but never past that. He sold it hoping the new 2200 would be better. Guess what....same issues just in a new package. I have used Leica rangefinders and they are spot on every time. At twice the price, they should be so it looks like you get what you pay for. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
General Discussion
Sig Sauer KILO 2200 Laser Rangefinder Review
Top