Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
sig sauer kilo 2000 rangefinder
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="cowboy" data-source="post: 1261111" data-attributes="member: 8833"><p>I sure don't disagree with your antenna analogy and the pricing level of the Kilo. I do think that Sig relealized that they were a brand new player in the optics world and they had to determine how to play in that game with zero % of the market share. Sig started up their optics division by luring quite a few Leupold personnel away. </p><p></p><p>I have been using Leica since their origin. Also bought one of the first Kilo's that hit the market and have compared them side by side too many times to mention. There are advantages/disadvantages to both units. I have had 2 Leicas go south, sent them in, wait forever and they come back working. My 2 Leica's are now long out of warranty and that is the main reason for me trying a Kilo. </p><p></p><p>I'm betting on the Sig name and reputation that if something goes south Sig will stand by it. I'm also betting Sig's pricing will creep up by offering updated models at much higher pricing and discontinuing some items that are not appealing to stock shareholders etc. I think their next release will go right after the G7 market.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="cowboy, post: 1261111, member: 8833"] I sure don't disagree with your antenna analogy and the pricing level of the Kilo. I do think that Sig relealized that they were a brand new player in the optics world and they had to determine how to play in that game with zero % of the market share. Sig started up their optics division by luring quite a few Leupold personnel away. I have been using Leica since their origin. Also bought one of the first Kilo's that hit the market and have compared them side by side too many times to mention. There are advantages/disadvantages to both units. I have had 2 Leicas go south, sent them in, wait forever and they come back working. My 2 Leica's are now long out of warranty and that is the main reason for me trying a Kilo. I'm betting on the Sig name and reputation that if something goes south Sig will stand by it. I'm also betting Sig's pricing will creep up by offering updated models at much higher pricing and discontinuing some items that are not appealing to stock shareholders etc. I think their next release will go right after the G7 market. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
sig sauer kilo 2000 rangefinder
Top