Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Sako VS Browning
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ofbandg" data-source="post: 3092952" data-attributes="member: 91402"><p>Sakos are finished better. The stainless stalkers have lousy triggers that need work right out of the box, and the barrels are great except that you might destroy the rifle trying to remove it. I have owned both in large magnum calibers and the synthetic stocks are comparable in shape although the Brownings need a bit of reinforcing along the barrel channel. That all being said, I would choose the Stainless Stalker in a heartbeat. Years of carrying in the mountains, shooting at the range, and using on game has made me a fan. They just feel good when I bring it up to my shoulder.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ofbandg, post: 3092952, member: 91402"] Sakos are finished better. The stainless stalkers have lousy triggers that need work right out of the box, and the barrels are great except that you might destroy the rifle trying to remove it. I have owned both in large magnum calibers and the synthetic stocks are comparable in shape although the Brownings need a bit of reinforcing along the barrel channel. That all being said, I would choose the Stainless Stalker in a heartbeat. Years of carrying in the mountains, shooting at the range, and using on game has made me a fan. They just feel good when I bring it up to my shoulder. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Sako VS Browning
Top