Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Equipment Discussions
Rangefinder Field Test: Swarovski 8x30 Laser Guide Vs. Leica CRF 1600 Rangemaster
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Broz" data-source="post: 529832" data-attributes="member: 7503"><p><strong>Re: Rangefinder Field Test: Swarovski 8x30 Laser Guide Vs. Leica CRF 1600 Rangemaste</strong></p><p></p><p></p><p> </p><p>Well, it looks as it is doing exactly what you wanted it to do and that is awesome. This was a good thread, I feel we have proven that there are good and bad ones for sure. The Swaro's had some of the same issues and also the freezing problem that required R & R of the battery. Out of the 5 I owned one was definatly better that the rest. But, Swaro's problem was not nearly as prevalent as the Leica 1600. Paul, I feel you own a top notch Swaro that is better than any I have owned. I have a CRF1200 that is a great unit and my son just bought a used one off this site that is equal to it. I remember your last Leica 1200 did not cut the mustard either. My point is, for years on here we have all reported our experiences testing RF's. Bottom line is, try before you buy, or buy with a reputable dealer, and test, test, test.</p><p> </p><p>For what it's worth, anyone considering buying a Vectronix PLRF10. I field tested 5 units side by side and took notes logged to their Serial number. They all were equal and ranged to 2990+ yards in full light. Not one would give me 3000 yds though. I have a feeling their price might be related to the laser quality and maybe some other components used. The result is high quality and all units are equal.</p><p> </p><p>Jeff</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Broz, post: 529832, member: 7503"] [b]Re: Rangefinder Field Test: Swarovski 8x30 Laser Guide Vs. Leica CRF 1600 Rangemaste[/b] Well, it looks as it is doing exactly what you wanted it to do and that is awesome. This was a good thread, I feel we have proven that there are good and bad ones for sure. The Swaro's had some of the same issues and also the freezing problem that required R & R of the battery. Out of the 5 I owned one was definatly better that the rest. But, Swaro's problem was not nearly as prevalent as the Leica 1600. Paul, I feel you own a top notch Swaro that is better than any I have owned. I have a CRF1200 that is a great unit and my son just bought a used one off this site that is equal to it. I remember your last Leica 1200 did not cut the mustard either. My point is, for years on here we have all reported our experiences testing RF's. Bottom line is, try before you buy, or buy with a reputable dealer, and test, test, test. For what it's worth, anyone considering buying a Vectronix PLRF10. I field tested 5 units side by side and took notes logged to their Serial number. They all were equal and ranged to 2990+ yards in full light. Not one would give me 3000 yds though. I have a feeling their price might be related to the laser quality and maybe some other components used. The result is high quality and all units are equal. Jeff [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Equipment Discussions
Rangefinder Field Test: Swarovski 8x30 Laser Guide Vs. Leica CRF 1600 Rangemaster
Top