Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rimfire and Airguns
Premium 22LR Rifles
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ntsqd" data-source="post: 2950095" data-attributes="member: 93138"><p>As I recall the 77/22 uses the same barrel retention design that the 10/22 semi-auto uses. Only a few of the best shooting 10/22 clones out there use a different barrel retention method. So the fault is not necessarily the design, but the execution of that design. Look into the various accuracy methods applied to the 10/22's, I think that you'll find applying those method(s) will have the same positive effect on a 77/22.</p><p>If the 77/22's barrel tenon dimensions are the same, then any barrel made for the 10/22 could be used in the 77/22.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ntsqd, post: 2950095, member: 93138"] As I recall the 77/22 uses the same barrel retention design that the 10/22 semi-auto uses. Only a few of the best shooting 10/22 clones out there use a different barrel retention method. So the fault is not necessarily the design, but the execution of that design. Look into the various accuracy methods applied to the 10/22's, I think that you'll find applying those method(s) will have the same positive effect on a 77/22. If the 77/22's barrel tenon dimensions are the same, then any barrel made for the 10/22 could be used in the 77/22. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rimfire and Airguns
Premium 22LR Rifles
Top