Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
Politics Of Hunting & Guns (NOT General Politics)
PA. Votes NO
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jbs2014" data-source="post: 1741872" data-attributes="member: 94052"><p>I think what most consider to be a"Fudd" would be those individuals that think that the Second Amendment only protects hunting and hunting type firearms.</p><p></p><p>A "Fudd" would think that no one has a " need" for semi autos like ARs, AKs, SCARs etc.</p><p></p><p>Many so called Fudds will operate under a doctrine of appeasement. They falsely think that if they compromise with the enemy and concede to demands to ban certain types of firearm that their hunting guns will be left alone. Which is false.</p><p></p><p>Any of that apply to you?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jbs2014, post: 1741872, member: 94052"] I think what most consider to be a”Fudd” would be those individuals that think that the Second Amendment only protects hunting and hunting type firearms. A “Fudd” would think that no one has a “ need” for semi autos like ARs, AKs, SCARs etc. Many so called Fudds will operate under a doctrine of appeasement. They falsely think that if they compromise with the enemy and concede to demands to ban certain types of firearm that their hunting guns will be left alone. Which is false. Any of that apply to you? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
Politics Of Hunting & Guns (NOT General Politics)
PA. Votes NO
Top