Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
Politics Of Hunting & Guns (NOT General Politics)
Non-resident license fees.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Plinker147" data-source="post: 2492142" data-attributes="member: 88320"><p>Federal court ruling said state can manage wildlife how they see fit. A states can charge whatever they want, and make what ever rules they want to regulate their hunting. After this ruling is when states started to put more quotas on non resident hunters. More and more states are doing thing like this. NM made it where non residents can't draw cow elk tags, saying the "meat" hunts were for the residents on the state. </p><p></p><p> I agree with non residents paying more and with the quotas. If I want to hunt your state I should have to pay more than someone who lives there. I do agree however the prices they are charging are getting out of hand and is contrary to the North American Model but so is all the governor tags that states sell to the highest bidder.</p><p></p><p>I always dreamed of a moose grizzly hunt in Alaska. But those prices are so out of hand for a non resident there is no way I'm paying 30k and taking that money from my family to go shoot an animal. It's is turning into the "Kings wildlife again"</p><p></p><p>I never heard of federal lands being owned by "everyone". Federal lands are owned by the government and managed for multiple uses of the people.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Plinker147, post: 2492142, member: 88320"] Federal court ruling said state can manage wildlife how they see fit. A states can charge whatever they want, and make what ever rules they want to regulate their hunting. After this ruling is when states started to put more quotas on non resident hunters. More and more states are doing thing like this. NM made it where non residents can’t draw cow elk tags, saying the “meat” hunts were for the residents on the state. I agree with non residents paying more and with the quotas. If I want to hunt your state I should have to pay more than someone who lives there. I do agree however the prices they are charging are getting out of hand and is contrary to the North American Model but so is all the governor tags that states sell to the highest bidder. I always dreamed of a moose grizzly hunt in Alaska. But those prices are so out of hand for a non resident there is no way I’m paying 30k and taking that money from my family to go shoot an animal. It’s is turning into the “Kings wildlife again” I never heard of federal lands being owned by “everyone”. Federal lands are owned by the government and managed for multiple uses of the people. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
Politics Of Hunting & Guns (NOT General Politics)
Non-resident license fees.
Top