Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Regional Forums
West
MT going to cut loose on wolves!!!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Gone Ballistic" data-source="post: 487465" data-attributes="member: 26477"><p>Topgun 30-06</p><p>I'm sure that there are many that feel the same way you do. The Anti's feel just as strongly the other way. If they didn't then why are they still fighting against delisting after the original amount of 300 wolves with 15 breeding pairs were met years ago. They definately proved their true colors and that was to keep them listed forever. I can't say as I disagree with the way you feel however, being realistic, one has to meet certain boundaries with some give and take anymore to be successful. Particularly when you're coming from the hunting side of an issue. As I stated earlier, it may or may not have had any different outcome but the thing is, and you can't deny it, Montana and Idaho did get to put a few of them down legally. Also, the whole issue Malloy used in his verdict was based on Wyoming not getting a similar plan as Idaho and Montana did. Those plans involved setting up seasons that limited maximum annual kills and treated wolves as a game annimal just as they do bears and mountain lions. Wyoming wanted to allow a shoot on sight with no fish and game intervention or limits. You can't dispute the facts.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Gone Ballistic, post: 487465, member: 26477"] Topgun 30-06 I'm sure that there are many that feel the same way you do. The Anti's feel just as strongly the other way. If they didn't then why are they still fighting against delisting after the original amount of 300 wolves with 15 breeding pairs were met years ago. They definately proved their true colors and that was to keep them listed forever. I can't say as I disagree with the way you feel however, being realistic, one has to meet certain boundaries with some give and take anymore to be successful. Particularly when you're coming from the hunting side of an issue. As I stated earlier, it may or may not have had any different outcome but the thing is, and you can't deny it, Montana and Idaho did get to put a few of them down legally. Also, the whole issue Malloy used in his verdict was based on Wyoming not getting a similar plan as Idaho and Montana did. Those plans involved setting up seasons that limited maximum annual kills and treated wolves as a game annimal just as they do bears and mountain lions. Wyoming wanted to allow a shoot on sight with no fish and game intervention or limits. You can't dispute the facts. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Regional Forums
West
MT going to cut loose on wolves!!!
Top