Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
Politics Of Hunting & Guns (NOT General Politics)
Montana & Arizona
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hugnot" data-source="post: 2014980" data-attributes="member: 115658"><p>Hey Jim:</p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-preventing-online-censorship/[/URL]</p><p></p><p>This would include Twitter & Facebook and even this worthy forum. Things are changing - private but publishing items for public viewing sort of like a newspaper. Any body may sign into a private social media and read it. Should the media stuff be entirely private require a membership & pass word to allow viewing.</p><p></p><p>As for nibbling away on gun rights - take a look at California with magazine restrictions that have been overruled by court order -2nd amendment? Is the California AG going to nibble away at that decision. Then there is Massachusetts, a gradual strangling of gun rights including bans on AR rifles, shotguns having pistol grips and magazines holding more than a certain amount of cartridges. Want to own a fully automatic weapon, just have a background check and pay a huge amount of tax $ except for certain states that ban machine guns. Violate the law and be punished like jail, fines, & loss of gun rights. Flint locks or AR15's - both contemporary weapons found in households to be used by "well regulated militias".</p><p></p><p>It seems that the liberal politicians want to ignore any requirement for constitutional ratification - like just do it.</p><p></p><p>17th Amendment - it would retain the conservative Montana Senator Daines should the Montana legislature go Democrat and conversely retain the self professed Montana value, but liberal, Jon Tester as senator under a Republican state legislature. This gives the people of the state the right to elect their senator. I don't see much conservative opposition to the 17th amendment - it would block conservative & moderate senate candidates from running for office in rabidly liberal states like California - like why bother. Things change, like fortunately in Montana where the libs were tossed out. The 17th Amendment puts more power to people and diminishes the "nobility" status of the U.S. Senate.</p><p></p><p>Who me - violating my oath of office? I don't have any authority to prevent any body from speaking or voting their choice but when they act without authority to deny my rights, they are violating my rights - an example would be the Missoula city council decision to ban private transfers inside city boundaries that was over ruled by the Republican AG then the Montana Supreme Court. When I did have authority to perform my responsibilities, I was extremely cautious to be in compliance with existing regulations and not to violate any person's rights - not lurch into some feel good stuff.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hugnot, post: 2014980, member: 115658"] Hey Jim: [URL unfurl="true"]https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-preventing-online-censorship/[/URL] This would include Twitter & Facebook and even this worthy forum. Things are changing - private but publishing items for public viewing sort of like a newspaper. Any body may sign into a private social media and read it. Should the media stuff be entirely private require a membership & pass word to allow viewing. As for nibbling away on gun rights - take a look at California with magazine restrictions that have been overruled by court order -2nd amendment? Is the California AG going to nibble away at that decision. Then there is Massachusetts, a gradual strangling of gun rights including bans on AR rifles, shotguns having pistol grips and magazines holding more than a certain amount of cartridges. Want to own a fully automatic weapon, just have a background check and pay a huge amount of tax $ except for certain states that ban machine guns. Violate the law and be punished like jail, fines, & loss of gun rights. Flint locks or AR15's - both contemporary weapons found in households to be used by "well regulated militias". It seems that the liberal politicians want to ignore any requirement for constitutional ratification - like just do it. 17th Amendment - it would retain the conservative Montana Senator Daines should the Montana legislature go Democrat and conversely retain the self professed Montana value, but liberal, Jon Tester as senator under a Republican state legislature. This gives the people of the state the right to elect their senator. I don't see much conservative opposition to the 17th amendment - it would block conservative & moderate senate candidates from running for office in rabidly liberal states like California - like why bother. Things change, like fortunately in Montana where the libs were tossed out. The 17th Amendment puts more power to people and diminishes the "nobility" status of the U.S. Senate. Who me - violating my oath of office? I don't have any authority to prevent any body from speaking or voting their choice but when they act without authority to deny my rights, they are violating my rights - an example would be the Missoula city council decision to ban private transfers inside city boundaries that was over ruled by the Republican AG then the Montana Supreme Court. When I did have authority to perform my responsibilities, I was extremely cautious to be in compliance with existing regulations and not to violate any person's rights - not lurch into some feel good stuff. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
Politics Of Hunting & Guns (NOT General Politics)
Montana & Arizona
Top