Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
How loud are brakes, to the shooter, in a hunting situation, in the woods?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Rich Coyle" data-source="post: 1341958" data-attributes="member: 70559"><p><strong><span style="font-size: 15px"><a href="http://www.longrangehunting.com/members/aspenbugle.6481/" target="_blank">aspenbugle</a>,</span></strong></p><p><strong><span style="font-size: 15px"></span></strong></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px">I was not in any way, in my ignorance, trying to start a ****ing contest here. It sure appears I owe you an apology. I don't remember the original poster asking for scientific proof of facts. It seemed as though he was asking for opinion. It seems you are accusing me and then doing the same thing. </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px">Let me give you an example:</span></p><p></p><p><strong>"For example, if you want to add something relevant, instead of opinion, why don't you share any facts"</strong></p><p></p><p>I did share the "fact" that all three un-prejudice men had the same impression of a braked and unbraked rifle.</p><p></p><p><strong>"and proof that just one or two unprotected hunting shots a year produce long-term, permanent hearing loss. You imply that you believe that"</strong></p><p></p><p>You appear to be reading something into what I posted.</p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>"If you have facts that help prove when permanent hearing loss begins occurring and how bad it is for braked vs. unbraked, then please offer them - that is what is most relevant to this thread."</strong></p><p></p><p>This is what you got from the origian post. I didn't. And some of the other posted didn't seem to get that either.</p><p></p><p><strong>"In any case, those 90% (thousand of them) of "immature" hunters out there may be interested to learn if their braked rifle is twice as loud and twice as likely to damage their hearing (if that is true)."</strong></p><p></p><p>This is more of you adding to my words. Many of them may not know about electronic hearing protection. If so they are merely ignorant and not immature. Those who do and think they don't need it are demonstrating their immaturity. Young people are ten feet tall and bullet proof. Adults should demonstrate themselves to be good examples for young people. I'm sorry if I offended you with my previous post or this response. I hope this is the worst thing that happens to both of us rest of the year.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Rich Coyle, post: 1341958, member: 70559"] [B][SIZE=4][URL='http://www.longrangehunting.com/members/aspenbugle.6481/']aspenbugle[/URL], [/SIZE][/B] [SIZE=4]I was not in any way, in my ignorance, trying to start a ****ing contest here. It sure appears I owe you an apology. I don't remember the original poster asking for scientific proof of facts. It seemed as though he was asking for opinion. It seems you are accusing me and then doing the same thing. Let me give you an example:[/SIZE] [B]"For example, if you want to add something relevant, instead of opinion, why don't you share any facts"[/B] I did share the "fact" that all three un-prejudice men had the same impression of a braked and unbraked rifle. [B]"and proof that just one or two unprotected hunting shots a year produce long-term, permanent hearing loss. You imply that you believe that"[/B] You appear to be reading something into what I posted. [B] "If you have facts that help prove when permanent hearing loss begins occurring and how bad it is for braked vs. unbraked, then please offer them - that is what is most relevant to this thread."[/B] [B][/B] This is what you got from the origian post. I didn't. And some of the other posted didn't seem to get that either. [B]"In any case, those 90% (thousand of them) of "immature" hunters out there may be interested to learn if their braked rifle is twice as loud and twice as likely to damage their hearing (if that is true)."[/B] [B][/B] This is more of you adding to my words. Many of them may not know about electronic hearing protection. If so they are merely ignorant and not immature. Those who do and think they don't need it are demonstrating their immaturity. Young people are ten feet tall and bullet proof. Adults should demonstrate themselves to be good examples for young people. I'm sorry if I offended you with my previous post or this response. I hope this is the worst thing that happens to both of us rest of the year. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
How loud are brakes, to the shooter, in a hunting situation, in the woods?
Top