Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Hammer ballistic coefficient tests...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hard rock" data-source="post: 2614002" data-attributes="member: 116620"><p>I'm curious what makes the OP such a expert on his B.C testing . I would think Steve's testing on his bullets are tested in good faith and published that way , of the thousands of bullets he has sold and as many shooters that has shot them I haven't read one complaint of the BC being way off , if any thing all positive . I keep hearing how this is a long range hunting forum , I would like too know how many members here need a high B C bullet for their actual hunting and big game killing distances. I bet if a survey is done on this forum 10 percent of the members , maybe has killed a big game animal over 500 Yds . I personally have a 600 yd limit and I'm not there yet . The high B..C bullets doesn't matter in my case and probably too most on this forum , but Terminal Performance does matter because they work from point blank too my self imposed limit of 600 yds as long as the impact vel is 1800 fps or faster . My perspective is Steve and his hunting group in Africa are testing a lot of there bullets too report back on the over all terminal performance of the Hammer bullets on different game at different distances . I have full confidence in the way they have arrived at their Published BC . I'm sure when they are back from Africa , Steve will chime in for clarification and explain there BC testing .</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hard rock, post: 2614002, member: 116620"] I’m curious what makes the OP such a expert on his B.C testing . I would think Steve’s testing on his bullets are tested in good faith and published that way , of the thousands of bullets he has sold and as many shooters that has shot them I haven’t read one complaint of the BC being way off , if any thing all positive . I keep hearing how this is a long range hunting forum , I would like too know how many members here need a high B C bullet for their actual hunting and big game killing distances. I bet if a survey is done on this forum 10 percent of the members , maybe has killed a big game animal over 500 Yds . I personally have a 600 yd limit and I’m not there yet . The high B..C bullets doesn’t matter in my case and probably too most on this forum , but Terminal Performance does matter because they work from point blank too my self imposed limit of 600 yds as long as the impact vel is 1800 fps or faster . My perspective is Steve and his hunting group in Africa are testing a lot of there bullets too report back on the over all terminal performance of the Hammer bullets on different game at different distances . I have full confidence in the way they have arrived at their Published BC . I’m sure when they are back from Africa , Steve will chime in for clarification and explain there BC testing . [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Hammer ballistic coefficient tests...
Top